PARTIES TO DISPUTE

SYSTEM FEDERATION N0. 45, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'

DEPARTMENT, A. F. OF L. (CARMEN)


ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS

DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES.-That Inspector W. L. McCaskill and Inspector J. A. Clark, employed as car inspectors at Texarkana, be paid at the rate of time and one-half for all time worked in excess of eight hours, per Rules 3 and 4 of agreement.

POSITION OF EMPLOYES.-


We contend that there is nothing in our agreement that allows or permits working anyone over eight (8) hours without paying time and one-half for same. The agreement does not provide for working extra men, and our contentions are they are all regular employes, who have been laid off or furloughed on account of reduction in force. When called back to work, the agreement covers them and they are entitled to time and one-half for all time worked over eight hours.





mitted to work for more than one man during a twenty-four hour period, without requesting or receiving time and one-half for so doing.

The rules are clear as written and cannot be sufficiently stretched to justify overtime at punitive rates in the case now under consideration. In a case that is not analogous, but in which the principle is the same, this Honorable Board in its Decision No. 24, has already ruled that it is not intended for a carrier to pay time and one-half when relief is furnished for the convenience of the employes, or when overtime is not earned under the rules.

Extra Inspectors McCaskill and Clark were properly compensated under the agreement, and to grant the request of the employes in this case would, in fact, grant them a new rule which is beyond the statutory authority of this Board.

We, therefore, request that the claim be denied.

FINDINGS.-The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor .Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.

Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.

The overtime rule involved in this dispute does not differentiate between regular assigned employes and extra men.




Claim of employes sustained.
                  NATIONAL RAILROAD AuJUSTMENT BoA$II

                  By Order of Second Division

Attest: J. L. MINDLINQ
          Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 2nd day of October, 1936.