PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 7, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'

DEPARTMENT, A. F. OF L. (CARMEN)




DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES: 1-That under the controlling agreement, wrecking service such as was performed near Pe Ell, Washington, on June 6, 1944, is the work of a regularly assigned wrecking crew.


2-That on June 6, 1944 the carrier did not comply with the controlling agreement, and particularly Rules 30 and 99, when bridge and building employes were assigned to pick up a derailed car near Pe Ell, Washington.


3-That the carrier be ordered to additionally compensate the members of the regularly assigned wrecking crew (Messrs. Loney, Shaffer, Madsen, Voorhees, Stellnak and Walk), at Tacoma, Washington, at the time and onehalf rate, from 5:00 P. M., June 6, to 1:30 A. M., June 7, 1944, 31,E hours traveling to the derailment, 11/2 hours working, and 3% hours traveling from the derailment to their home point.


EMPLOYES STATEMENT OF FACTS: At Tacoma, Washington, the carrier maintains a wrecking outfit and a regularly assigned wrecking crew and the regular assigned hours of these wrecking crew claimants on June 6, 1944, were from 7:30 A. M. to 5 :00 P. M.


On June 6, 1944, after 4:00 P. M. the carrier assigned bridge and building employes who were using a locomotive crane to load wrecked flat car NP 122368 on another car, one and one-half miles west of Pe Ell, Washington, and this car was then sent to South Tacoma shops for repairs where it was repaired for further service. The distance from Tacoma, the home point of the claimants, to the point where this wrecking service was performed is 79 miles.


The claimants were not called to perform this wrecking service, but if they had been called to do it, they would have been in service the additional time claimed, which the carrier has declined to pay.




CARRIER'S STATEMENT OF FACTS: On October 17, 1943, log fiat NP 122368, loaded with logs, was derailed near Pe Ell, Washington. Pe Ell is located 80 miles from Tacoma. The logs on this car were unloaded on the right of way and the car was tipped over clear of the track by the train crew



1090-5 392

FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



In a recent award, this Division was confronted with a similar question. We quote from Award 878, Judge Rudolph as referee:






    Claim sustained.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

              By Order of Second Division


ATTEST: J. L. Mindling,
Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of June, 1945.