PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 14, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'

DEPARTMENT, A. F. OF L. (FEDERATED TRADES)




DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES: 1. That the classification of Working Mechanical Foreman with regularly assigned duties of inspection and maintenance of locomotives is not authorized by the terms of the current agreement. 2. That accordingly the carrier be ordered to disestablish the aforesaid position and handle said work consistent with the terms of the current agreement. EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The carrier maintains at Brownsville, Texas, hours, forces, facilities for doing work, and motive power, described belowa) From 7 A. M. to 7 P. M., a working mechanical foreman. b) From 7 A. M. to 3 P. M., one car inspector and one car oiler. c) From 7 A. M. to 6 P. M., a laborer. d) From 8 A. M. to 5 P. M. a machinist helper.











In addition to the above there are two hostlers. One operates from
2 P. M. to,10 P. M., and the other from 12 Midnight to 8 A. M.
[312]
1245-8 319

now contending is being violated. It is further evident that the employes in submitting this protest to the Board are endeavoring through that medium to have removed from the agreement, or at least made meaningless and worthless, a provision now contained in the agreement which was originally negotiated and placed therein in good faith by the parties thereto. This, we respectfully suggest, the Board is without authority to do. Therefore, it is the position of the carrier that the protest here presented by the employes should be dismissed.


FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.











·' duties to perform work."

The carrier relies on the second and third paragraphs of the rule to support their contention. It was not the purpose of the second paragraph of Rule 20 to permit locomotive department foremen at points where locomotive mechanics are employed, to do mechanics' work on locomotives. The third paragraph of Rule '20 does not support the carrier's position in this case.







ATTEST: J. L. Mindling
Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of May, 1948.