The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in

addition Referee Adolph E. Wenke when award was rendered.


PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 10, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'

DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L. (Firemen & Oilers)


THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN

RAILROAD COMPANY


DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES: That the carrier be ordered to allow Fireman and Oiler V. E. Southam to exercise displacement rights in the group from which transferred, under the terms of the current collective agreement.


EMPLOYE'S STATEMENT OF FACTS: The carrier's personal employment record at Salt Lake City, Utah, of Fireman and Oiler V. E. Southam, hereinafter referred to as the claimant, follows:













After having regularly employed this claimant in the power plant as a fire cleaner for over two years, the carrier elected to abolish his job as such, and thereupon, effective August 29, 1946, reclassified him from a fire cleaner in the power plant at the rate of 931/2 cents per hour to that of a laborer in the power plant at 811/2 cents per hour, a reduction of 12 cents per hour or 96 cents per day.


The claimant immediately attempted to exercise his displacement rights to a position in the group from which transferred, and the carrier then and since has declined to adjust this dispute.




POSITION OF EMPLOYES: It is submitted that the claimant was transferred or promoted for a period of over two years, from the rank and pay



1267-4 47S





With respect to this rule, the carrier holds that in the case at hand it was not violated. Although Mr. Southam was paid the machinist helpers' rate of pay from April 2, 1943, to August 4, 1944, he was never transferred or promoted to the position of machinist helper. Neither did he ever perform any of the duties of a machinist helper. Furthermore, Mr. Southam was never transferred or promoted to the position of fire cleaner. Neither did he perform the duties of a fire cleaner. Not having been promoted to the position of fire cleaner by bulletin and not having performed any of the duties of this position, there being no such position in existence in the power plant at Salt Lake City, it was of course not possible to abolish the job, consequently Mr. Southam, when paid his correct laborers' rate on August 29, 1946, had no displacement rights to exercise.


The carrier contends in this case that the work Mr. Southam is now performing at the power plant at Salt Lake City is the same work he performed prior to and during the period he was paid the rate of pay of a machinist helper and a fire cleaner.


The carrier also contends that simply because Mr. Southam was paid a rate higher than the laborers' rate during the war emergency, a rate that was not negotiated to cover power plant laborers, he is not entitled to exercise any displacement rights when he reverted to his correct rate of pay with the ceasing of the war emergency, and the claim therefore should be denied.


FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:.


The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



1267-s 479

Claimant was never actually transferred or promoted to a Class "A" position within the intent and pursuant to the provisions of Rule 12 (b) of the parties' current agreement. Consequently, he acquired no rights thereunder.








ATTEST: J. L. Mindling,


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of July, 1948.