The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Edward F. Carter when the award was rendered.
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 30, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L. (Federated Trades)
DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES: That in accordance with the applicable agreements the Carrier be ordered to compensate John Skretny, retired Carman Helper, Henry A. Vormeng, retired Machinist, and Nicolaus Bochonok, retired Machinist Helper, five (5) additional days' vacation pay.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: John Skretny, Henry A. Vormeng and Nicolaus Bochonok, hereinafter referred to as the Claimants, were employed by the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as the carrier.
Claimant Skretny has been in the continuous employment of the carrier at Buffalo Creek, New York, from July 4, 1923, until he retired on November 1, 1953, in accordance with the provisions of the Railroad Retirement Act.
Claimant Vormeng has been in the continuous employment of the carrier at Lincoln Park, New York, from August 1, 1911, until he retired on November 30, 1953, in accordance with the provisions of the Railroad Retirement Act.
Claimant Bochonok has been in the continuous employment of the carrier at Glenwood, Pennsylvania, from July 1, 1913, until he retired on January 1, 1954, in accordance with the provisions of the Railroad Retirement Act.
Upon retiring, the claimants were paid by the carrier in the year 1954 in an amount of money equivalent to ten (10) days' vacation.
This dispute has been handled with the carrier up to and including the highest officer so designated by the company, with the result that he has declined to adjust it.
The agreement effective September 1, 1926, as it has been subsequently amended is controlling.
For all the reasons given above the carrier submits that the claim coming from Mr. Skretny, Mr. Vormeng and Air. Bochonok for "additional days' vacation pay," arising under the new vacation amendments, cannot be supported under an application of that agreement. The Carrier respectfully requests that this Board so hold and that this claim be declined in its entirety.
FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
The claimants are retired employes of the carrier who claim an additional five (5) days' vacation pay for the year 1954. 2283-5 644
Claimant John Skretny retired on November 1, 1953, and was paid for ten (10) days' vacation earned for 1954. Claimant Henry A. Vormeng retired on November 30, 1953, and was paid for ten (10) days' vacation for 1954. Claimant Nicolaus Bochonok retired December 31, 1953, and was paid for ten (10) days' vacation earned for 1954. Each claims an additional five (5) days' vacation pay earned for 1954 under the retroactive provisions of the August 21, 1954 vacation agreement.
' The facts in these claims are similar to those set forth in Award 2151. The reasoning of that award is controlling here and requires a sustaining award.
Carrier contends that the claims,are barred by the time limit provisions of the August 21, 1954 Agreement. The time of filing the claims was not a subject of dispute on the property. A failure to raise the issue on the property is a waiv r of the time limit rule insofar as the handling on the property is concern We are convinced from the record before us that these three claims a handled together by the 'carrier's highest officer designated to handle claims. The carrier's contentions in this respect cannot be considered here.