TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA
(Railroad Division) A. F. of L.-C. I. O.
DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES: That it is in violation of the present agreement, Article 10(a), paragraph 3 and Article 32, Rule 10, paragraph (a), to force a junior employe to take a vacation vacancy without asking the senior employes if they desire the vacation vacancy.
That in claim No. 27-56, Mr. James Mendicino was not asked on May 18, 1956, to fill the said vacation vacancy but a junior man was forced on the job.
That in claim No. 28-56, Mr. Evo Renacci was not asked on May 18, 1956 to fill said vacancy but the junior man was again forced on the job.
That both Mr. Mendicino and Mr. Renacci are senior employes to the employes that were forced on the vacation vacancy and neither one had been asked if they desired to fill the vacation vacancy.
STATEMENT : The above question was submitted to the Second Division of the National Railroad Adjustment Board by the above referred to organization in ex parte form, hearing thereon was waived, and the Division is now in receipt of a joint request that the case be withdrawn.