The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addi

tion Referee D. Emmett Ferguson when the award was rendered.


PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 29 RAILWAY EMPLOYES'

DEPARTMENT A. F. of L.-C. I. O. (Carmen)


GULF, MOBILE AND OHIO RAILROAD (Southern Region)







EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: J. C. Lundy, hereinafter referred to as the claimant, was employed by the Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad (Southern Region), hereinafter referred to as the carrier, as a carman at its Frascati Shops, Mobile, Alabama. Claimant was regularly assigned to work Monday through Friday, with Saturday and Sunday as rest days. On December 30, 1955, claimant notified his foreman that he was leaving the service of the Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad at the close of his tour of duty on January 3, 1956.


Master Mechanic W. C. Gray called claimant to his office at or around 9:30 A. M. on January 3, 1956 and claimant left the service of the Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad at that time and was paid 21/2 hours for January 3, 1956.


The Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad refused to pay claimant eight (8) hours at the pro rata rate of pay for January 2, 1956 which was the day observed as New Year's Day.


This dispute has been handled with the carrier up to and including the highest officer so designated by the company, with the result that he has declined to adjust it.



2517-3 677

that date, claimant went to the office where he made known that he was quitting the job, and gave no reason for not completing the tour of duty.


The current agreements between this carrier and its shop craft employes are on file with your Honorable Board, and are, by reference, made a part of this submittal.


POSITION OF CARRIER: Section 3 of Article II of the Chicago agreement dated August 21, 1954, and here applicable, deals with the subject of "Holidays", and reads:









Carrier submits that this question should be resolved by an affirmative answer to the first query, and that any other determination lends itself to encouragement of questionable practices on the part of an employe who might be so minded.


Accordingly, carrier contends that the instant claim should be denied, and prays your Honorable Board to so decide.


FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




J. C. Lundy, the claimant, was a regularly assigned carman who decided to resign. On December 30, 1955, he notified his foreman that he intended to leave after January 3, 1956. He worked the day before the New Year's holiday and on January 3rd, the day following the holiday, he came in and worked until 9:30 A. M.


The submission before us is unclear as to whether Lundy was called into the office or went in voluntarily and as to what was said between himself and the master mechanic. However, it is undisputed that he went home without completing the day. He was paid for the two and one-half hours worked but he was refused pay for the holiday which is the demand of his present claim.







2517-4

The rule does not state how much compensation shall be paid in order to qualify. A strict application of the rule, to the agreed fact that Lundy received compensation for two and one-half hours, requires a sustaining award.



    The claim is sustained.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of SECOND DIVISION


              ATTEST: Harry J. Sassaman

              Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of June, 1957.