The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Livingston Smith when the award was rendered.
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 101, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, AFL-CIO
(Electrical Workers-Communications Dept.)
FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
The confronting claim is presented in behalf of one W. C. Haupt, classified as telephone inspector, for eight (8) hours' pay, punitive rate, for April 5, 1956, and all subsequent dates when certain maintenance work was allegedly performed by employes not covered by the effective agreement.
The work in question concerns maintenance of an electronic scale or weighing mechanism at Allouez, Wisconsin. The record indicates this instrument was installed on the carrier's property by the Remington Rand Corporation on a "rental-use" basis. The record further indicates that employes of the carrier preformed maintenance work thereon and during the winter season assisted in the overhauling of the weighing instrument. However, it is noted that such work, insofar as the company's employes were concerned, was for the basis of training. .Some time after the initial installation of this device a supplemental agreement was entered into between the carrier and the Remington Rand Corporation under and by virtue of which all maintenance of this device was restricted to that supplied by Remington Rand Corporation as long as the ownership thereof was vested in that Corporation.
While it is true that arrangements were made to train carrier personnel (electricians) to take over the repair and maintenance of the aforesaid equipment, it is clear that the assumption of these duties by electricians, as reflected by the correspondence between th parties, was contingent upon the sale and delivery of said equipment to the carrier.
In brief, the maintenance work in question did not belong within the scope of the agreement unless and until the device was purchased by and turned over to the carrier.