NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
PARTIES TO DISPUTE
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 30, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L.-C. I. O. (Electrical Workers)
BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, THE
DISPUTE:
CLAIM OF EMPLOYES:
1. That the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company violated
the provisions of the current working agreement between the
Carrier and System Federation No. 30, particularly Rules 29 and
125, as well as the accepted procedure contained in the Carrier's
decision, dated August 13, 1954, and also the clarification of
Article VII of the August 21, 1954 Agreement, effective November
1, 1954.
2. That accordingly, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (hereinafter called the Carrier) be ordered to compensate C.
M. Stickley, Jr. (hereinafter called the Claimant) for eight (8)
hours each on June 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16, 1958
as a result of Carrier's failure to comply with the provisions of the
rules agreement.
STATEMENT: The above question was submitted to the Second Division of the National Railroad Adjustment Board by the above referred to
organization in ex parte form and the Division is now in receipt of a request
from the employes that the case be withdrawn.
AWARD
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of SECOND DIVISION
ATTEST: H. J. Sassaman
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 22nd day of June 1959.
[265'7