The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Francis B. Murphy when award was rendered.
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 99, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L.-C. I. O. (Electrical Workers)
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Illinois Central Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as the carrier, maintains a warehouse, identified as Warehouse No. 1, at 1300 Girod Street, New Orleans, La., which is on the carrier's property, in which they rent space to sevaral meat packing concerns, one of which is assigned to a Mr. William J. Schroeder.
J. B. McDade and H. B. Wederstrandt, hereinafter referred to as claimants, are regularly employed by the carrier as electrical workers and hold seniority as such under the terms of the current agreement, at New Orleans, La.
The carrier authorized Mr. William J. Schroeder to have electrical conduit, wiring, receptacles, etc., installed in and about the carrier's Warehouse No. 1
In conclusion, the carrier would like to emphasize the fact that this is not a case where the carrier let out a contract to a private contractor but is a case where a private individual, on his own volition, contracted and paid for improved facilities on a platform which he had right of use. The work involved in this claim was not required by the carrier, and no other employe of the carrier was assigned to perform the work. There is no basis whatsoever to the claim the employes have brought before this Board because the agreement covers only the work undertaken by the carrier in connection with its operation of its railroad. The work involved herein does not fall in that category, and this claim should be denied.
FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record, and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
The carrier owned a warehouse at New Orleans but it had not been in use for a number of years.
As a matter of accommodation, various meat packers who desired space, were assigned portions of Warehouse No. 1 to expedite the unloading, segregation and delivery of their products. Mr. William J. Schroeder was permitted to use a portion of the warehouse and found it necessary for his use to add electrical conduits, wirings, etc. The organization contends that under the agreement this work, which was contracted by Mr. Schroeder to a local firm, was work that should have been done by claimants.
We are unable to find any violation of the agreement in this case. The purpose of the agreement between the carrier and the organization is to pro- 5435-8 166