SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 152, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L. - C. I. O. (Sheet Metal Workers)
DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES: 1. That under the current agreement the Carrier failed to notify the representative who filed the claim within sixty (60) days from the date instant claim was filed, in writing, the reasons for such disallowance.
2. That the current agreement, particularly the footnote in the Sheet Metal Workers' Graded Work Classification, was violated when the Carrier advertised four (4) new positions to the Carmen's craft, covering items of work accruing to the Sheet Metal Workers, as provided for in the Sheet Metal Workers' Graded Work Classification, instead of filling these positions from the roster of the Sheet Metal Workers' craft.
3. That accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to advertise these positions to and fill from the roster of the Sheet Metal Workers' craft and the following named claimants be compensated for all the time involved for the period October 13, 1958, until the positions are properly advertised and the work assigned to the Sheet Metal Workers' Craft:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Sheet metal workers (pipefitters) previously listed as claimants, hereinafter referred to as the claimants, are employed by the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as the carrier, on the carrier's Pittsburgh Division.
The carrier posted advertisement Bulletin No. 67, dated October 13, 1958, covering the four (4) positions in dispute and assignment Bulletin No. 67, dated October 26, 1958, and correction Bulletin No. 67, dated October 26, 1958.
The major duties of the four (4) positions involved cover work included by the following paragraph in the graded work classification for sheet metal workers:
The footnote in the sheet metal worker graded work classification covers the work involved:
In the handling of this case on the property, a joint submission was prepared by the carrier and the employes and is submitted herewith and will be employes' Exhibit A-3. 3 7 46-15 681
FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
The carrier urges that the Board may not properly proceed in this case unless all parties likely to be affected by an award are given notice as required by Section 3, First (J) of the Railway Labor Act. The record shows that the notice was issued and the question raised by the carrier is moot.
The Employes contend that in view of the footnote appearing under Grade E in the Sheet Metal Workers' graded Classification in the Rules Agreement, the four positions of Car Repairman advertised by Carrier in Bulletin No. 67 in Yard "C" Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as new positions should have been advertised to Sheet Metal Workers. We quote the footnote:
There was a joint statement of agreed upon facts entered into between the Carrier and the employes, and it sets out that a part of the duties of the four (4) positions involved, includes work covered by the following paragraph in the graded work classification for sheet metal workers. We quote from the Joint Statement of Agreed upon Facts:
Thus it is agreed that the footnote in the sheet metal workers agreement covers the above work.
The carrier by closing down certain yards, to consolidate and perform the work in New Yard "C" created new positions and Bulletin No. 67 specifies yard positions advertised at the new location Yard "C" and refers to each one 3746-16
specifically as a new position, and those new positions not advertised as yard positions were transferred to Penn. Station.
The footnote specifically provides "But as vacancies occur or new posi tions are created covering these items of work they will be filled from the roster of the Sheet Metal Workers Craft."
The footnote provides "No separation of these items of work shall be made where such separation would require the use of more employes than would be required if the work were continued as part of the Carmen's Craft," and the Carrier contends that any separation of work in Yard "C" would require two additional men, and that on this account, that any such separation of work is specifically prohibited by the Second paragraph of the footnote.
This question was settled when the carrier and the employes entered into the Joint Agreement: We quote:
The carrier violated the current agreement when it advertised four new positions to the carmen craft covering items of work accruing to the sheet metal workers, instead of filling these new positions from the roster of the sheet metal workers craft. The claim of Employes must be and is sustained.