The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in

addition Referee Mortimer Stone when the award was rendered.


PARTIES TO DISPUTE

SYSTEM FEDERATION No. 12, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'

DEPARTMENT, A. F. OF L. - C. I. 0.

(Sheet Metal Workers)


CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY











FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This case involves the same parties and. agreements and presents the same issues as considered and decided in Award No. 3910. Like award should follow.


3911-2 76

                  AWARD


    Claim denied.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of SECOND DIVISION


              ATTEST: Harry J. Sassaman

              Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 5th day of January 1962.

DISSENT OF LABOR MEMBERS TO AWARDS 3910, 3911 AND 3912

The record shows that the repairs and overhauling of lee Engines and Generators is work covered in the agreement between the Chicago and North Western Railway, and all that class of employes represented by System Federation No. 12 Railway Employes Department A. F. of L: C. I. 0. Employes in the electrical workers', sheet metal workers' and machinists' craft performed their respective work on ice engines and generators for over twenty years, that is, from 1936 to 1957 when the carrier, under the guise of selling such equipment as unserviceable, contracted the work out and it was performed by employes not subject to the agreement between the parties to the present dispute. This is in violation of Rule 29 which provides that "None but mechanics and apprentices regularly employed as such, shall do mechanics' work as per special rules of each craft", in this instance Rules 62, 103 and 115.


The findings of the majority is an attempt to uphold the' carrier in defeating the very purpose of the governing agreement and a contravention of the Railway Labor Act's prescription to "maintain agreements."


                  LABOR MEMBERS


                      E. J. McDermott


                      C. E. Bagwell


                      T. E. Losey


                      Edward W. Wiesner


                      James B. Zink