Award No. 4152
Docket No. 3925
2-SLSW-CM-'63
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
The
Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Howard A. Johnson when award was rendered.
PARTIES TO DISPUTE
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 45, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L.-C.1. O. (Carmen)
ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY LINES
DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES:
1. That under the rules of the controlling agreement the Carrier
improperly compensated members of the Pine Bluff Wrecking Crew
composed of the following Carmen:
F. A. Koonce, Engineer
J. W. Carter, Assistant Engineer
D. A. Robinson, Groundman
J. R. Lee, Groundman
A. Helvey, Groundman
H. E. Gatlin, Groundman
N. Funderburg, Groundman
R. E. Lee, Groundman
when they were denied compensation between the hours 8:20 P. M.,
September 30, 1959 and 7:00 A. M., October 1, 1959.
2. That accordingly the Carrier be ordered to compensate the
aforesaid members of the wrecking crew for the aforementioned hours
at the time and one-half rate or a total of 16 hours at straight
time rate.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The St. Louis Southwestern
Railway Lines, hereinafter referred to as the carrier maintains at Pine Bluff,
Arkansas, a complete wrecker toutfit and crew, composed of the aforementioned regular assigned' members, hereinafter referred to as the claimants.
The regular assigned hours of all claimants for the period is dispute were
from 7:00 A. M. to 12:00 Noon and 12:30 P. M. to 3:30 P. M., with Saturday
and Sunday regularly assigned rest days. On the evening of September 25,
1959, Train No. FX18, northbound was involved in a derailment at Mile Post
133, near Gibson, Arkansas, located approximately 134 miles from Pine Bluff.
4152-11
28
McDoel and that they should be paid from 4:50 P. M. on June 22,
1951, to 6:25 A. M. on June 23, 1951.
We think carrier acted within its managerial prerogative in tying
up the crew at Orleans at 6:50 P. M. on June 21. The hospital train
was not ready to move at that time. Claimants contend it could have
been made ready in an hour. Carrier asserts it actually required two
and one-half hours. The conditions of the power units and cars in the
train and the inherent dangers involved certainly justified the carrier
in moving this train into Lafayette during daylight hours when conditions could be better observed.
The claim for pay for the lay-over period at McDoel cannot be
sustained. There is evidence that there was no, crew at McDoel who
held contractual rights to operate this train from McDoel to Lafayette.
But even if this could be construed as negligence on the part of the
carrier, nevertheless other considerations justify the lay-over at
McDoel. It had taken three hours and fifty minutes to move the train
from Orleans to McDoel, a distance of forty miles. At the same rate
of progress, it would have taken almost nine hours to move from
McDoel to Lafayette. We think the carrier was justified in not commencing the trip at 4:50 P. M. on June 22.
It is true that this train movement was made with a minimum of
difficulties. It made the trip McDoel to Lafayette in five hours and
twenty minutes, a better time than was expected. But carrier was
required to make its decision on the situation as it appeared before
the trip was made, not on the facts as they subsequently proved to be.
A carrier is required to look out for the safety of its property and its
employes. An estimation of time for moving a train such as the one
here involved cannot be made with accurracy. As long as there is a
reasonable basis for the judgment exercised, no basis for a claim
exists."
III
It is clearly evident this claim is not supported by the rules and carrier
submits that it should be denied.
FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
It is the carrier's contention that the condition of damaged equipment
in the hospital train was such that it was necessary to travel by daylight and
observe its condition; however the train was moved by a transportation
department crew and not by the wrecking crew, which had completed its
work at the wreck.
4152-12
29
This Division has held in prior awards that provisions like Rule 7-2 for
relief from duty on the road relate to actual working periods and not to time
waiting or traveling after the work has been completed. Awards 790, 1028,
1048, 1078 and' 1971.
AWARD
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of SECOND DIVISION
ATTEST: Harry J. Sassaman
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of February 1963.