The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in

addition Referee Joseph M. McDonald when award was rendered.


PARTIES TO DISPUTE
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 101, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L.-C. I. O. (Carmen)
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

















EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: At Interbay, Washington, a point where the Great Northern Railway Company (hereinafter referred to as the carrier) employes carmen, a fully equipped wrecking outfit is maintained and the wrecking crew members regularly assigned by bulletin.


Carman Harry Tansil, was assigned as the wrecker derrick fireman, by bulletin. On his first trip as wrecker derrick fireman, Carman Tansil, hereinafter referred to as the claimant, was disqualified as wrecker fireman without being given a fair trial.


Conference was held on August 22, 1961, at which time the carrier officer was shown the letter written by the claimant explaining his side of the story but the carrier declined to recognize it or offer anything old or new in support of its position.



4214-8 786

Third Division Award No. 10078, O.R.T. v. S.P. (Pac. Lines), Referee Thomas C. Begley:




THE CLAIM OF THE ORGANIZATION, THEREFORE,

IS WITHOUT MERIT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:


1. The organization admits that the job of steam derrick fireman is complicated and that the claimant was not sufficiently qualified to handle the duties of such a position on July 14, 1960.




3. The organization has failed to prove that the carrier did not give the claimant a fair chance to qualify.


For the foregoing reasons, the carrier respectfully requests that the claims of the employes be denied.


FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




Carrier, at the time this dispute arose, maintained a large, steam powered wrecking derrick at Interbay.


On July 12, 1960, the Claimant was awarded a bulletined position as the wrecking derrick fireman.


On July 14, 1960, the wrecking crew and derrick were called to a derailment at Bellingham, Washington, between the hours of 5:00 and 6:00 P. M. and Claimant went along on his first assignment as wrecking derrick fireman.


On July 19, 1960, Claimant was advised by the Car Foreman at Interbay that the travelling engineer and derrick foreman had complained that Claim-

4214-9 787

ant's work at the Bellingham derailment was unsatisfactory and that claimant was not qualified and that he was relieved from the position.


At the scene of the Bellingham derailment Claimant experienced difficulty with the water injector and with the firing of the boiler, and until corrected a twenty-five minute delay in the operation ensued.


The record discloses that the former fireman of this equipment was along on this trip as a groundman; that there was present an experienced engineer who knew the boiler operation; and that Claimant's instruction and assistance prior to the call, and enroute, was meager until the difficulty arose at the scene of the derailment.


We are not called upon to determine, nor can we, that Claimant is, or was qualified, but only to determine if he was given a fair trial before being returned to his former position.


A fair trial under Rule 4 (a) connotes to us an objective judgment, after adequate observation of a course of conduct, that a person is or is not qualified to render the service required.


Under the facts contained in this record, even though Claimant was at least in part responsible for a mishap which delayed the operation for about twenty-five minutes, we find that he was given only one trial, with inadequate instruction and assistance, and we find that the action relieving him and returning him to his former position was hasty and unwarranted, and that he was denied a fair trial within the meaning and contemplation of Rule 4(a).


Since this occurrence, there is no longer a position of derrick fireman in existence at Interbay. Rule 4(a) carries no particular sanction, except to insure a fair trial.










Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of June 1963.