NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Joseph M. McDonald when award was rendered.
PARTIES TO DISPUTE
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 17, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L.-C. I. 0. (Carmen)
THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD
RAILROAD COMPANY
DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES:
1. That the Carrier improperly paid Car Inspector Paul Kelly for
services rendered on February 23, March 24, March 26 and March
27, 1961.
2. That accordingly the Carrier be ordered to pay Car Inspector
Paul Kelly in the following manner and amounts:
Thursday, Feb. 23rd-8 hrs. str. time @ $2.594 per hr. $ 20.75
Thursday, Feb. 23rd - 7.8 hrs.
11/2
time @ $3.891 per hr. 30.47
A total of $51.21 less what he had been paid.
Friday, Mar. 24th - 8 hrs. str. time @ $2.594 per hr. 20.75
Friday, Mar. 24th-8:V4 hrs.
11/2
time @ $3.891 per hr. 32.10
A total of $52.85 less what he had been paid.
Sunday, Mar. 26th-8 hrs. str. time @ $2.549 per hr. 20.75
to
Monday, Mar. 27th - 28.75 hrs. 1
i/2
time @ $3.891 per hr. 112.86
A total of $133.61 less what he had been paid.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Paul Kelly, hereinafter referred
to as the claimant, is employed by the New York, New Haven & Hartford R.R.
Co., hereinafter referred to as the carrier, as a car inspector at South Station
Terminal, Boston, Mass., on a regular assignment working Wednesday to
Sunday, 7:00 A. M. to 3:00 P. M., Monday and Tuesday as rest days.
On February 22, 1961, the claimant was instructed by the carrier, to
make himself ready to appear in court, in New York City, a distance of 229.5
miles from his home terminal, as a witness for the carrier on the following
day.
The claimant departed South Station, Boston, Mass., @ 8:00 A. M. February 23rd, arrived in New York at 12:20, appeared before the court during
[752]
4578--9
760
ther, that the sole payment to one held off his
assignment on a work day is
the earnings of his assignment.
The claim presented by the employes goes beyond these provisions of
Rule 22 and into an area not the subject of agreement between the parties.
In a similar question of jurisdiction the Third Division, National Railroad Adjustment Board (Referee McMahon), said in Award No. 8838:
"The work here involved is not exclusively that of the Clerks.
Such can only be acquired by negotiation between the parties. This
Board has no authority to make any change, by adding to for detracting from the provisions of the rules as agreed to between the
parties. The claims are without merit as applied to the provisions
of the Agreement and shall be denied."
Similarly in Award 3086 your Board said:
"Our only function is to determine if the agreement has been
violated.
"If this practice of requiring physical examinations is unfair or
inequitable it should be corrected by negotiation."
We respectfully submit that the subject of this dispute is a negotiable
matter not within the jurisdiction of this Board to grant.
In summary, it is the position of the carrier that:
1. The sole payment to which Mr. Paul Kelly is entitled for
being held off his regular assignment on February 23, March 24, and
March 26 is one day's pay at straight time.
2. The sole payment to which Mr. Paul Kelly is entitled for
being held at court from 9:00 A. M. to 5:00 P. M. on March 27, an
assigned rest day, is eight hours at penalty time.
3. The employes concede there is no provision under the rule for
the payment of travel or waiting time.
4. The employes by their failure to except to the standing interpretation over a period of seventeen years have, in effect, assented
to the carrier's interpretation.
5. That the instant claim finds no support either in rule or practice and should for all the reasons set forth here be denied.
FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
4578-10
761
In the instant dispute, Claimant Kelly is in almost the identical situation
as Claimant Dunford in Award No. 4577, except that only one rest day of
Claimant Kelly is involved.
That which we said in Awards 4576 and 4577 regarding the interpretation
of Rule 22 of the controlling agreement, is equally applicable here and dispositive of this dispute.
AWARD
Claim 1: Overruled.
Claim 2: Denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of SECOND DIVISION
ATTEST: Harry J. Sassaman
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 24th day of July 1964.