The Second Division consisted iof.the regular members and in
addition Referee Howard A. Johnson when award was rendered.
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 101, RAILWAY EMPLOYES' DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L. - C. I. O. (Firemen & Oilers)
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Laborer Earl Birkeland, hereinafter referred to as a claimant, entered the service of the Great Northern Railway Company, hereinafter referred to as the carrier, May 2, 1936 as a laborer in the roundhouse at Willmar, Minnesota and has been continuously employed since that time. Laborer Ray Haats, hereinafter referred to as a claimant entered the service of the Great Northern Railway Company July 14, 1937 as a laborer in the roundhouse at Willmar. Minnesota and has been continuously employed since that time. Laborer Wendell Norsten, hereinafter referred to as a claimant entered the service of the Great Northern Railway Company August 4, 1941 as a laborer in the roundhouse at Willmar, Minnesota and has been continuously employed since that time, while Laborer Emil Gynild, hereinafter referred to as a claimant, entered the service of the Great Northern Railway Company September 11, 1936 as a laborer in the roundhouse at Willmar, Minnesota and has been continuously employed since that time.
3. Watering and servicing of locomotives has been performed by locomotive engineers, firemen and hostlers under various circumstances dating back many years before the organization negotiated its first schedule agreement covering roundhouse laborers.
For the foregoing reasons, the carrier respectfully requests that all of the claims of the employees be denied.
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
As in that award, we conclude that the evidence in the record does not support a finding that the work in question was exclusively within the jurisdiction of this Organization's members. For that reason these claims must be denied.