.".*m Award No. 4792
Docket No. 4699
2-L.Y-CM-'65





The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in

addition Referee Dudley E. Whiting when award was rendered.


PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 96, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'

DEPARTMENT, AFL-CIO (Carmen)








EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Carman S. A. Pilecki is regularly assigned to position as car inspector on the 2:30 P. M. to 10:30 P. M. shift at East Buffalo, N. Y. The claimant was notified to appear on March 7, 1963 in accordance with the following letter dated March 2, 1963:






A question and answer statement was taken from the claimant and Mr. Shoop on March 7, 1963 by the officer, Master Mechanic G. P. Barth.




It is for these reasons: a clear and admitted failure to comply with instructions of a superior as developed and admitted in a hearing and investigation, conducted as required by the current agreement, the resultant discipline which must be viewed as neither unjust nor harsh but which was actually lenient under the circumstances, that the carrier respectfully requests that this claim be denied.


FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934;


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




The record of the hearing shows that the claimant refused to perform work as directed. There is no question about the right of an employe to refuse to comply with an order which involves an immediate hazard to his safety or health. The claim is based upon the contention that such was the reason for the claimant's refusal to work as directed in this instance.


The difficulty with that contention is that it is not supported by the record of the hearing, which shows that claimant stated his reason for refusing to be that he could not work that run by himself under the conditions. It is obvious that this was a refusal to work as directed because the other car inspector had been sent home, rather than because the assignment represented an imminent hazard to his safety or health.




    Claim denied.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

              By Order of SECOND DIVISION


ATTEST: Charles C. McCarthy
Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 4th day of November, 1965.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.

4792 12