Award No. 5138
Docket No. 4986
2-CB&Q-CM-'67
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
SECOND DIVISION
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Harold M. Weston when award was rendered.
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 95, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, AFL-CIO (Carmen)
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY
RAILROAD COMPANY
DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES:
1 - The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company violated the controlling agreement by closing out of service John Jones,
Coach Cleaner, 14th Street Passenger Yard, Chicago, Illinois for
allegedly appropriating company property for his own use at the
Car Washer, at Union Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, August 10, 1964.
2 - That accordingly, Coach Cleaner John Jones be reinstated to
service of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company
without loss of seniority, make claimant whole for all pass and vacation rights, pay the premiums (for hospital association dues) for
Hospital, Surgical and Medical Benefits for all time held out of
service, and pay the premiums for Group Life Insurance for all time
held out of service, and compensate the claimant, Mr. John Jones, for
all time lost from August 11, 1964, until so restored.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Coach Cleaner John Jones,
hereinafter referred to as the claimant, was discharged from the service of
the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, hereinafter referred
to as the carrier, by a letter dated August 11, 1964:
"for appropriating company property for your own use at the Car
Washer, at Union Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, August 10, 1964."
Subsequent thereto, claimant requested a hearing as provided in rule 31
of the controlling agreement by letter dated August 12, 1964. Claimant's request for hearing was granted by letter dated August 13, 1964. Hearing was
held on Friday, August 21, 1964.
The claimant had worked for the carrier since October 16, 1945, his
assigned hours were 8 A. M. to 4:30 P. M.
was dismissed for failing to make out checks for food served to patrons, and
failing to remit the money received. Because the chef and waiter-in-charge,
who were also dismisad, were subsequently reinstated on a leniency basis, the
claim of the waiter was progressed to the board on the basis that he also
was entitled to reinstatement. The board held-
THIRD DIVISION AWARD 8574
(JCDE v. CB&Q, Referee Sempliner)
"There appears to be little merit to the claim. Claimant was dishonest. He failed to properly account for Carrier's funds which came
into his possession. This is clear and unequivocal. Where dishonesty
is involved leniency cannot be lightly indulged in by the reviewing
authority." (Emphasis ours.)
In the instant case leniency is likewise not to be considered by the board.
In summary, the carrier restates its position in this case as follows:
1. The claimant was guilty of the charge of misappropriating
company material, as proved by eye witness testimony, unexplained possession of a great deal of company property,
and a signed admission.
2. The past record of claimant, including a dismissal for the
same offense, was properly taken into consideration in determining this penalty.
3. His dismissal cannot be considered unjust, and the railroad
should not be burdened with this employe.
The claim must be denied in its entirety.
(Exhibits not reproduced.)
FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
Claimant, a coach cleaner with about nineteen years' employment with
Carrier, was dismissed on August 11, 1964, for appropriating Company property consisting of two cases of empty soft drink bottles and such miscellaneous items as 7 towels, 5 wooden hangers, 5 pairs of rubber chemical gloves,
a used white waiter jacket, a wash brush and other objects.
While Claimant failed to explain adequately just why he had some of the
above items in his possession, enough uncertainty attends the matter to per-
5138 16
suade us that the record is insufficient to warrant such extreme disciplinary
action as discharge for an employe with his length of service.
Under the specific circumstances of the present case, we will direct
Carrier to offer Claimant immediate reinstatement to a positon substantially similar to that he occupied on August 10, 1964, with seniority and vacation rights unimpaired but without back pay of any kind. These Findings are
confined to the facts in this record and are not to be controlling in other
situations.
Claimant reinstated with seniority and vacation rights unimpaired but
remainder of claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of SECOND DIVISION
ATTEST: Charles C. McCarthy
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of April, 1967.
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, III. Printed in ILS.A.
5139 17