The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Joseph S. Kane when award was rendered.
1. That at Weldon Coach Yard the Carrier is violating our Sched ule of Rules governing the working conditions, when the bulletin new jobs or vacancies and fail to fill or abolish these vacancies at the termination of bulletin.
Written applications will be received in my office for the next five (5) days, or until 8:00 A. M., February 7, 1965 for the following vacancy.
It has been clearly shown that the "dispute" submitted by the Electricians is actually no dispute over interpretation of the Shop Crafts' Agreement. This claim is based solely on the organization's proved misinterpretation of an elementary provision of the Forty Hour Week Agreement - that positions are not to be confused with individual work assignments.
Unfortunately the union has quoted the term position with the term "assignment."
The company has shown that merely by substituting the proper definition of the term in the conditions governing five, six, and seven day positions, the unions' references to various provisions of the Forty Hour Week Agreement becomes meaningless.
It has been shown that the maintenance of relief assignments in no way afects tb.e nature of seven day operations. Most important it has been clearly demonstrated that management has a vested right in determining the conduct of its operations. In seven-day operations management need not work every assignment every day.
The company has further shown that even if the agreement has been violated, the monetary claim could not be sustained. No electrician at Weldon Coach Yard lost compensation by virtue of the blanking of relief assignment R-6, Weldon Coach Yard. Therefore, no electrician would be entitled to penalty pay as claimed.
FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
The carrier contended that the sole issue presented here is whether or not every regular assignment in a seven-day operation must be worked seven days a week. The Union contended that when the job was blanked on the offday of the regular incumbent, the job becomes a five-day position, as defined in Rule 1, B-1, and the rest days become Saturday and Sunday.
The Weldon Yard works seven days a week, twenty-four bours a day. Electricians are employed there and work a staggered week to maintain service around the clock seven days a week.
A relief job No. R-6 was bulletined and the occupant relieved jobs No. 22, 23 and 33 from Friday to Tuesday inclusive. Part of the time from December 16, 1963, to April 1, 1965, job No. R-6 was filled for a period of forty-one days. The position was continually being bulletined but rarely occupied, then blanked when no electricians bid on the job.
Thus, while No. R-6 was blanked, the rest days oaf jobs No. 22, 23 and 33 were not covered by a relief man and worked five days per week with rest days other than Saturday or Sunday.
It was the contention of the claimants that the carrier should fill the rest days of jobs No. 22, 23 and 33 with a relief man, making the rest days Saturday and Sunday. Therefore, the penalty was derived from this failure, as required by Rule 19 of the current agreement. If the relief job had been filled, the rest days of the three jobs in question would have been Saturday and Sunday.
It was further contended by the claimants that as a result of the handling of the jobs in this manner, the positions became five-day positions and, Rule 1, B-1 applied, off days, Saturday and Sunday.
An examination of the Rules and facts presented revealed the claimants occupied seven-day positions.