The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Francis B. Murphy when award was rendered.
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 97, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, AFL-CIO (Carmen)
THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
(Coast Lines)
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, hereinafter referred to as the Carrier, maintains a force of carmen and car inspectors, and the car repair forces are regularly assigned on one (1) eight-hour shift, with assigned working hours of 7:30 A. M. to 12 noon, and 12:30 P. M. to 4 P. M. Carman L. J. Pipitone, hereinafter referred to as the Claimant, was assigned to the above-mentioned working hours on the repair tracks, with a regular assigned work week of Monday through Friday, rest days of Saturday and Sunday, at Bakersfield, California.
On December 23, 1963 the Claimant was directed by the Carrier's Supervision not to report on his regular assigned car repairer's position on December 24, 1963, rather to report to the trainyards on the second shift to fill a vacancy created through a seniority move which was being bulletined.
This dispute has been handled up to and including the highest officer so designated by the Carrier, who all have declined to make satisfactory settlement.
The Agreement effective August 1, 1945, as subsequently amended, is controlling.
All that is contained herein has been both known and available to the Employes or their representatives.
FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
The claimant in this case was transferred from one shift to another shift, under orders from his foreman. He was paid the equivalent of 12 straight time hours for 8 hours work on the date named in the claim, namely, December 24, 1963, which is a requirement of Rule 12. This rule permits such a transfer and clearly provides therefor. The claim is without merit since the claimant's regular assignment was blanked on December 24th.