- Award No. 5819


NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

SECOND DIVISION


The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in

addition Referee John J. McGovern when award was rendered.


PARTIES TO DISPUTE
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 16, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, AFL - CIO
(Machinists)
NORFOLK ANTS WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY

DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES:




EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The aforesaid employe, hereinafter referred to as the claimant, is regularly employed by the Norfolk and Western Railway Company, hereinafter referred to as the carrier, as a machinist at Brewster, Ohio.


Claimant's birthday fell on a vacation day of his vacation period for which he was paid a day's vacation pay. However, carrier failed to allow his birthday holiday compensation.


Claim was filed with the proper officer of the carrier contending that claimant was entitled to eight (8) hours' birthday holiday compensation for his birthday holiday, in addition to vacation pay received for that day plus interest, and was subsequently handled up to and including the highest officer of the carrier designated to handle such claims, all of whom declined to make satisfactory adjustment.


The agreement effective September 1, 1949, as subsequently amended, is controlling.


POSITION OF EMPLOYES: It is respectfully submitted that the carrier erred when it failed and refused to allow claimant eight (8) hours' birthday holiday compensation for his birthday holiday, in addition to vacation pay allowed for that day.

Carrier would particularly like to call to the Board's attention Second Division Awards 5230, 5231, 5233, 5310, 5311, 5328, 5329, 5330, 5414, 5415, 5416, 5417, 5418, 5419, 5420, 5422, 5442, 5443, 5444, 5445 5446, 5447, 5448, 5449 and 5450. Also see Third Division Awards 9640, 9641 and Fourth Division Award 2169. These were identical claims to the one here being considered and in all cases the claims were denied. Carrier will not burden the record by quoting these awards, but a careful reading will reveal that the position is fully denied.


Even if there was merit to this claim, and there is not, under no rule, practice, understanding or otherwise would 6% interest be justified.


FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




The facts and principal issue presented in this case are identical to those in Award Number 5818, with the exception that Claimant is requesting 6% interest per annum on the full amount of the claim computed to the time of payment of the claim. For the reasons stated in that award, we will sustain paragraphs 1 and 2 of the claim to the effect that Carrier will compensate the Claimant for 8 hours at the straight time rate as birthday holiday compensation. We can find no basis for the 6% interest and accordingly will deny paragraph 3 of the instant claim.










ATTEST: Charles C. McCarthy
Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of December, 1969.

Central Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 46206 Printed in U.S.A.

5819 9