NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

SECOND DIVISION


The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in

addition Referee John J. McGovern when award was rendered.


PARTIES TO DISPUTE

SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 6, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'

DEPARTMENT, AFL - CIO

(Carmen)


CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES:



EMPLOYES STATEMENT OF FACTS: At Council Bluffs, Iowa, the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company hereinafter referred to as the carrier, maintains a Repair Track, Train Yard and Diesel House where employes are employed around the clock, seven days a week. On July 16, 1967 there were 17 carmen and 9 carmen helpers regularly assigned at Council Bluffs. All employees at Council Bluffs were furloughed on Sunday, July 16, 1967 beginning with the Second Shift.


The eight claimants were assigned and were furloughed as follows on July 16, 1907.


Claimant Shift Rest Days Time Notified How

H. C. Hansen 12 Mid. 8:00 Fri. & Sat. 2:30 P.M. Telephone
R. L. Mas 8:00 A.M. 4:00 Sat. & Sun. 6:30 P.M. Telephone
D. P. Jennings 8:00 to 4:00 Sat. & Sun. 9:00 P.M. Telephone
L. A. Patten 4:00 12Mid. Wed. & Thur. 3:30 P.M. Telephone
L. L. Riddle 4:00 12Mid. Sat. & Sun. 12:10 P.M. Telephone
H. V. Hansen 4:00 12Mid. Thur. & Fri. 3:25 P.M. Came to work
& was sent
back home.
R. B. Birding 12:30 P.M. Telephone
E. Jabens 4:50 P.M. Telephone

vision Award 4918) and that an award of your Board which "alter§, changes or amends a collective bargaining agreement is a usurpation of power" (Hunter v. A.T.U.S.F. Rwy., CCA 7, 171 Fed. 2d 594).




In conclusion, the carrier states that the claim of the organization is without support and should be denied.


FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




On July 16, 1967 a strike was called by the Machinist Craft against Carrier resulting in the latter furloughing the eight claimants involved in this dispute. The basis of the claim as submitted is that insufficient notice was given in violation of Article VI of the National Agreement of August 21, 1954, which reads as follows:



All employees were furloughed on Sunday, July 16, 1967, the day of the strike. The eight claimants were assigned and were furloughed as follows on July 16, 1967.


Claimant Shift Rest-Days Time Notified How

Hansen 12 Mid-800 Fri-Sat 2:30 PM Telephone
Mass 8:00 A.M.-4:00 Sat-Sun 6:30 PM Telephone
Jennings 8:00 AM-4:00 Sat-Sun 9:00 PM Telephone
Patten 4:00-12:00 Mid. Wed-Thur 3:30 PM Telephone
Riddle 4:00-12:00 Mid. Sat-Sun 12:10 PM Telephone
Hansen 4:00-12:00 Mid. Thur-Fri 3:25 PM Came to work
& sent home
Birding 4:00-12:00 Mid. Sun-Mon 12:30 PM Telephone
Jabens 8:00 AM-4:00 PM Sat-Sun 4:50 PM Telephone

The principal defense of the Carrier in this case is that, since they were not given advance notice of the strike, ergo, they were unable to comply with the 16 hour notice. This is no defense. The language of the National Agreement, quoted intra, is clear and precise. From the facts of record, we will sustain the claim as to all Claimants with the exception. of Claimants Riddleand Bird-


5834 7
ing, whom we find, did receive proper advance notice. Claim sustained consonant with the opinion as expressed.







ATTEST: Charles C. McCarthy
Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 16th day of December, 1969.

Central Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 46206 Printed in U.S.A.

5834 8