The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Nicholas H. Zumas when award was rendered.
SYSTEM FEDERATION No. 41, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0. (Carmen)
THE CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY
(SOUTHERN REGION)
'3uidduaas aoS llassn-d of pauxnlaa aq of st,lopuo2 aqq oluo, «sxonaj at,a_ pa}laaann aqq pt,ol of put, ISUIOPU02 atq uaoaT ~,s~lanal at,a_ pa2t,utt,pun atll p'eoiun of pasn st,nm aut,aa atlZ 'auuaa aql paiut,dutooau aadlaq t, pun TOqt,-Tado ouvao ally 'aut,a0 ST-02i AUMM To aaut,uaquit,W t, qlim 2uolu luautliuaap So luiod aqq of luas aaam saua t,lopuo2 ui papt,ol ,sAanjj avo_ L96T `gg saqola0 u0
'L96T `OT aaqolo0 uo aainaas 2uplaaann uxoxj paeailaa ajam lfaql ft,nm ;o jq2ia aqq To ivol;) sauo palit,aap atll 2uillnd aalyt, pus °pallua aaam smeaa 2ui~laa,zm 'Bxanluag `liassn-j uioaj: salitu g-V jttoqt, paaanzao luatulit,aap v `L96T `6 aaqoloo u0
'uiaaatl panlonui alndsip aqq .xano uoilaipsianf suq pat,og luatulsnfpV aql So uoisini(I silly
TUT `TZ aunp panoaddt, se lay aoqu·I At,m -11t,g aql To 2uiut,aui aql uiqliAn aSoldtua puu aeia.rea Alanilaadsaa ant, alndsip siql ui panlonui safolduza ao aSolduaa aql put, saeiaat,a ao aaiaat,a aqL
:It,ql spud °aouepina aql Ilt, put, paooea alotlnn atll uodn `pat,og luauzlsnfpV atll So uoisini(j puooag acly :SDXIQKId
'aauulsul situ ui patu.aopad 3laom aqq of slq2V lunlot,aluoa ou anuq slut,uzit,-la aql lt,qs (9)
'panlonui aaaq 3laom So adSl atlq aoj IITIno 2uploa.zm at,ln2aa aql ti's oq palu2ilqo lou si .aai.aat,a atll ItILf; (fi)
'2ui3laaaAn SU paxapisTioa aq `lou plnoa put, `lou si uoilualuoo ui aaaq 3laom aqq ~[t,qy (g)
'ast,a luulsui atll of alquoilddu lou aau saAoldtua aql Aq palia saln.z aql qt,qy (Z)
-lat,d aiaql uo luatuaaa2V sljt,aD dolls atll To uoiluloin ou uaaq st,q aaaql luql (T)
'op louut,a Saql `silly 'uoilisod .zioql aluiluulsqns of palu2ilqo Aqaaaql aau put, p.tt,og situ of tuit,la situ jq2nozq ant,q saAoldma ally
·uxit,la luulsui atll Sq pa.aanoa aLUil So uoilaod t, [OT palt,suaduzoo 2uiaq Sqa:caql alup lutll uo sluaTuu.,3isst, at,lr2,aa .aiaql pa3liom slut,mit,lD etll 3o qloq palt,ls Alsnoinaad st, `oslV 'uoilsanb ui alt,p aql uo s3lanal aua qq~iaaj fuipt,olun puu 2uipt,ol Ulim uo;aaauuoo ui aain.zas paLuso,~xad joqt,aado aql dluo qt,ql molls spaooai au=i 'ST-Og atll o1 paufisst, sa:folduca SuAAk So aaut,ualurvW oml aaam aaaql·dnoqllV 'n^.e.ta pata.4ssu ~flaulnfaa atll So ouo So aouasqt, aql uo spued -ap aa·c: as xt,a l.ool aoj pasn Juiaq ui duipuujs sill sic pallt,o uaaq anuq plnom umo.ag luql aaut,ansst, ou st aaaql `aanamotl :aut,sa aql aluaado of pallua uaaq ant,q plnonn aaag lnt,d aaaui..Wua qaiaaap pau2isst, dlauln2aa aql uaql 'aaut,qsui siql ui I,Z-OM ~laixtap at,a 100,1 atll asn of Asussaa-au li pamaap saiaat,a atll
On October 24, 1967, regularly assigned wrecking crews returned to the point of derailment to resume wrecking service, and to retruck the cars left at the point of derailment.
The issue presented in this dispute is whether, under the circumstances, the loading and unloading work performed by the M. of W. crane and its crew was work that should have been performed by carmen.
At the time in question (October 23, 1967), there is no indication that a wrecking crew was called nor is there any evidence that wrecking equipment was required to perform the work. Under these circumstances, absent a contractual agreement, the awards are clear that the performance of such work by other than carmen is not a violation of the Agreement. See Awards 4131, 5197, 5438 and 5768.