The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in

addition Referee Jesse Simons when award was rendered.


PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 114, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'

DEPARTMENT, AFL-CIO (Carmen)


SOUTHERN PACIFIC LINES

(Pacific Lines)


DISPUTE: CLAIM OF EMPLOYES:

1. That under the current agreement Car Inspector T. H. Mack (hereinafter referred to as the Claimant), was unjustly deprived of his service rights and compensation when he was improperly discharged from service under date of September 10, 1969 after 20 years service with the Carrier.








EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Car Inspector T. H. Mack (hereinafter referred to as the claimant), was employed by the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (hereinafter referred to as the carrier), and at the time of dismissal had 20 years service with the carrier at Los Angeles, California.

The Board has previously interpreted this rule providing for compensation for "wage loss, if any" as requiring deduction of outside earnings in computing compensation due. See Second Division Awards 2523 and 2653.


The carrier respectfully submits that having conclusively established that the claim is entirely without merit, it should be denied.


All data herein submitted have been presented to the duly authorized representative of the petitioner and were made a part of the particular question in dispute.


The carrier reserves the right, if and when it is furnished with the submission which may have been or will be filed ex parte by the petitioner in this case, to make such further answers as may be necessary in relation to all allegations and claims as may be advanced by the petitioner in such submission, which cannot be forecast by the carrier at this time and have not been answered in this, the carrier's initial submission.


FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The Board finds that the record makes abundantly evident that the Claimant committed a violation of Rule "G."


While the above misconduct constituted just grounds to discipline the Claimant; the Board is persuaded, that in view of the Claimant's unblemished employment record of 20 years, that discharge was excessive, and is therefore ordering; reinstatement of Claimant to ser-rice forthwith, with all rights restore 1.



Claimant reinstated, in accordance with above findings, with seniority and other contractual rights unimpaired, btAt without compensation for lost time.



ATTEF,T: E. A. Killeen
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of October, 1971.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
sls6 18