The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in

addition Referee Joseph E. Cole when award was rendered.


PARTIES TO DISPUTE

SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 154, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'

DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L. - C. I. O. (Carmen)






1. That under the current agreement the Carrier improperly compensated Carmen Peach, Stewart, Klein, Kaemmerer, Wilkie, Horvath, Schlemmer, Wright, Hoffman an'i Thurston for service rendered on various dates in September and October, 1966.


2. That accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to additionally compensate each in the amount of twelve and one-half (12%) cents per hour at the time and one half rate as follows:





















EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Carmen Peach, Stewart, Klein,
Kaemme:r, a r, Wilkie, Horvath, Schlemmer, Wright, Hoffman and Thurston,
hereinafter referred to as the Claimants, are employed by the Alton and
Southern Railway Company, hereinafter referred to as the Carrier, as Car
Inspectors regularly assigned to positions which carry the differential rate
of pay of twelve and on-o-half (1210 cents per hour above the freight Car
man's rate for using two-way portable radios.

On the dates listed in the Statement of Claim the Claimants were used to augment the force of Carmen on the repair track for which they were paid at the freight Carman's rate of pay of $2.9678 instead of the rate of $3.0928 to which they were regularly assigned.


As a result of Carrier's contentions, this is the fourth time that such dispute has bean submitted to your Board. One of the three previous disputes submitted to your Board was denied in award 5631 solely for lack of-proof. The other two disputes were sustained in Awards 5440 and 6130.


Th~s dispute has been handled with Carrier officials up to and including the highest officer designated by the Company, with the result he has declined to adjust it. ,


The agreement effective January 29, 1947 as subsequently amended. is controlling.


POSITION OF EMPLOYES: The Employes and the Carrier reached an agreement on date of March 11, 1966 providing for a 121/2 cents per hour differential for using two-way portable hand radios. Copy of that agreement is attached hereto and identified as Employ es' Exhibit "B."






Immediately after that agreement was reached all train yard Car Inspectors' positions were assigned to use the radio. Bulletin was posted March 23, 1966 so advertising all Car Inspectors' positions, designating the rate of pay as $3.0928 par hour. Copy of that bulletin consisting of three pages is attached and identified as Employes' Exhibit "C."


Attached hereto and identified as Employes' Exhibit "D," consisting of two pages, is copy of assignment Bulletin No. 6A-66 dated April 7, 1966, showing Claimants Peach, Horvath, Wright, Klein, Wilkie, Kaemmerer and Thurston being award positions which carry the Radio Rate as advertised in Bulletin No. 5-66 dated March 23, 1966. Attached and identified as Employes' Exhibit "E," consisting of two pages, is copy of assignment Bulletin No.


6308 2

in those- other disputes upon which the Board has ruled in the past, Rule 10 does not and did not apply. There was no need to liberate a parade of horribles and consider the question of what would happen if the claimants had been forced to work the overtime. In these disputes, claimants were not forced - were not required - to fill the place of other employes.


This Board has been asked to expend an inordinate amount of time on what Carrier believes to be a very straightforward proposition: that Carrier be allowed to compensate its employes in accordance- with terms of existing agreements. Claimants in this case voluntarily performed overtime work as carmen. Such performance is compensated at the rate of one and one-half times the basic carmen's rate. Claimants were so compensated. Had they been required to carry or use radios, claimants would have been entitled to additional compensation as claimed. They were not required to carry or use radios. There is no basis for additional compensation and the Employes' claim in this dispute should be denied.


FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the emnloye or -employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21; 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



After carefully considering the record in this case, w2 will follow prior Awards of this Division, i.e., 5440, 5631 and 6130, which involved these same parties and similar issues and sustain this claim for as was stated in Second Division Award No. 6113 (Referee Simons):












Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 2nd day of June 1972.
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
6308 11