The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Joseph E. Cole when award was rendered.
SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 30, RAILWAY EMPLOYES'
DEPARTMENT, A. F. of L. - C. I. O. (Carmen)
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: On March 3, 1970, the claimant was hired as a carman helper by the Carrier. Attached hereto and identified as Exhibit A is the January 1, 1971, seniority roster showing his relative position to other helpers.
Under date of March 3, 1971, the claimant bid on carman helper position on Job No. H 74, H 73 or H 70. General Foreman J. A. Stevenson signed receipt for his application.
Under date of March 8, 1971. the claimant was assigned by bulletin to helper position H73 working 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M., rest days, Saturday and Sunday on #4 Motor Car.
On March 8:, 1971, the claimant was directed to fill carman's position on A 15 truck. The claimant elected to remain as a helper on .#4 Motor Car. The supervisor sent him home. Junior Helpers Isenok and Mathews remained on helper positions.
Under date of March 8, 1971, notice was given for Hearing to be held on March 11, 1971, with claimant charged with:
was subsequently discharged. In sustaining the dismissal, the Board held in pertinent part:
In the instant case, Alban was given at least a week's notice that he might be required to work as a Carman on March 8, 1971. Neither Alban nor the Brotherhood took any steps under the agreement to protest this assignment. When Alban was given a direct order to work as a Carman on March 8, 1971, he deliberately refused to obey. Under the circumstances, the Carrier submits the instant claim is completely without merit and should therefore be denied.
FINDINGS: The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whop record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herrein.
We fully realize hat there has to be authority between carrier and employe.
I refer to earlier agreements that state that there are certain unalienable -rights of all individuals.
I consider that one of these unalienable rights is that I do not have to work anywhere if I do not want to.
I do not know why the claimant would take the employment as carman, but I do not consider that this is an issue here.