Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 6341
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 6164
2-SLSF-SM-'72
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert G. Williams when award was rendered.
( System Federation No. 22, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Sheet Metal Workers)
(
( St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier o r carrier s and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



After attempts to temporarily repair a Diesel locomotive failed the Carrier sent a derrick to remove and replace the engine truck with a "dummy" truck. The Carrier's Diesel Supervisor oversaw this ,job and in the process actually disconnected four sand hoses. This disconnect work required a total of some eight minutes.

The Claimant's contend that the work involved in this dispute is included in Rule 94, Classification of Work. This rule provides that "connecting and disconnecting of air . . . pipes" is recognized as Sheet Metal Workers work. If this was the only issue in this case, the claim would be sustained.
Form 1 Award No. 616
Page 2 Docket No.


Rule 94, however, is limited by Rule 98. Rule 98 provides that Sheet Metal Workers will be sent to outlying points for work, "but not for small, unimportant running repair jobs." In this case the work in dispute took only eight minutes to perform. Such a time period shows the work was a small job and, therefore, the Carrier was not required to send a Sheet Metal Worker to this outlying point.

The Claimant's contention that a Supervisor is prohibited from doing this work is without merit. Rule 31 (a) and (b) provide that foremen and other supervisors are not prohibited from performing work in the exercise of their duties. Rule 31 (d) also provides that "incidental work" may be performed by mechanics of other crafts. Given these specific provisions of Rule 31 on the Assignment of Work a majority of this Board believes the Supervisor's performance of eight minutes work did not involve a contract violation.



        Claim denied.


                                    NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD By Order of Second Division


                                                              i

                                                              I


                Attest: , ecutive Secretary


                  Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 7th day of July, 19T2.