(Advance copy. The usual,printed copies will be
sent later.)
Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJt1STBOARD Award No. -,479
SECOND
DIVISION Docket No. 6329
2-SPT(PL)-EW-t 73
The
Second Division
consist of the
regular members and in
addition Referee Irving R. Shapiro when award was rendered.
( System Federation No. 114, Railway Employee'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dis=te: ( (Electrical Workers)
(
( Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Pacific Lines)
Dis,Rate:
Clain 2f ftleXgs:
.1. That under
the
current Agreement, Mechanical Department Electrician
C. W. Jones was unjustly treated when be was dismissed from service
on !!ay 13, 1971,
following investigation for alleged violation of
Rule 801 of the General Rules and Regulations of the Southern Pacific
Transportation Company on April 2, 1971.
2. That accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to:
(a) Restore the aforesaid employee to
service, with all service,
seniority rights and vacation rights
unimpaired and compensate
' him for all time lost with
payment of 6%
interest added
thereto.
(b) Make payment of all hospital, medical, life insurance and
Railroad Retirement contributions
for all time that the afore
said employee is held oat of service.
Findings;
The
Second Division of the Adjustment
Board,
upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds
that:
The carrier or carriers and the employs or employes
.involved in
this
dispute
are
respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment
Board has
jurisdiction
over
the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The authority of this Board, as set forth in the Railway Labor Act is
extensively confined. We are limited to review the record put before us;
ascertain whether the terms of the Controlling Agreement between the parties
had been complied with, and, in cases involving disciplinary action taken against
an employs, determine whether Claimant was afforded a fair hearing and that the
i
penalty assessed was not arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable.
i
Form 1 Award No.
6+79
Page
2
Docket No.
6329
2-SPT(PZ)-Ew-·73
There is no material disagreement between Petitioner and Carrier as
to the facts involved in an incident which occurred on April 2,
1971.
Claimant,
who had been in Carrier's employ two and one-half months, undeniably was a
participant in an altercation with a fellow employe shortly after .commencement ,
of his work shift. Even if we were to give credence to the valiant effort on
Petitioner's part to endeavor to excuse Claimant's unquestionably reprehensible
conduct on the alleged ground that he was provoked, we cannot conceivably overlook the admitted fact that Claimant had on his person a lethal weapon which he
brought into play during the course of the affray.
Based upon the record before us, it cannot be held that termination
of the Claimant was arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. We have stated
in innumerable A,rards that we are not empowered to entertain any plea for
leniency. This is solely in the discretion of the Carrier.
AWARD
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT HOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: -
J
L
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of April, 1973.
I
i