(Advance copy. The usual printed copies will be sent later.)
Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No.
6515
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
6370
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert A. Franaen when award was rendered.
( System Federation No. 16, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute:( (Carmen)
( Norfolk and Western Railway Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:.
1. That the Norfolk and Western Railway Company violated
the Current Agreement when it improperly compensated
Carman H. 0. Clemson, at the straight time rate of pay I
for changing shifts August 4,
1970.
2. That the Norfolk and Western Railway Company be ordered
to additionally compensate Carman H. 0. Clemson for four
hours at the straight time rate for said violation on
August
4, 1970,
and in addition be paid interest of
6%o
per
annum, compounded annually on the anniversary date of the
claim until paid.
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway
Labor Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
On August
3, 1970
Claimant was recalled from furlough and assigned to a
third shift position with hours from 11 PM to
7
AM. While working that shift
Claimant noticed that there was a first shift position under bulletin with hours
of
7
AM to
3
PM. Claimant filed a written request that he be allowed to work said
first shift position during the period of bulletin stating that he would protect
as of August
4, 1970.
The Carrier complied with Claimant's request and Claimant
commenced working said position at
7
AM August
4
after he finished his third
shift he had commenced at 11 PM August
3, 1970.
l
Form 1 Award No.
6515
Page 2 Docket No.
63(
2-N&W-CM-'73
f
The Organization alleges that the proper application of Rules 6(a) and
(b) and 12(a) and (b) support the claim herein. The Carrier responds to the
effect that under Rule 12(c) and others its method of payment to Claimant was
correct.
Rules 6(a) and (c) and 12(a), (b) and (c) are as follows:
OVERTIIYTF
Rule No.
6
(a) All overtime continuous with regular bulletined hours
will be paid for at the rate of time and one-half until
relieved, except as may be provided in rules hereinafter
set out.
(c) For continuous service after regular working hours, employes
will be paid time and one-half on the actual minute basis,
with a minimum of one (1) hour for any such service performed.
OVERTII,' - CHANGING SHIFTS
Rule No. 12
(a.) Except as provided in Paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this
rule, employes changed from one shift to another will receive
overtime rates for the first shift of change. Employes working
two or more consecutive shifts on new shifts shall receive overtime rates when changed back to their regular shift.
(b) This, however, does not apply to employes who are changed from
one shift to another as a result of bidding in a new job or
vacancy, or to employes who are displaced by employes older in
seniority and forced onto a new job, or to employes who are
changed from one shift to another to fill permanent vacancy or
new job account of being the youngest employe in seniority. Such
employes shall receive pro rata rate for such change.
(c) Employes desiring to change shifts on account of sickness or
other good causes may do so without expense to the Company,
provided arrangement is made through the official in charge.
The Organization further relies on a Letter of Understanding dated
May 15,
1956
which reads as follows:
~I
I,
I
Form 1 Award No.
6515
Page
3
Docket No. 637C
2-N&W-Ch:-'
73
THE VIRGINIAN RAILWAY COMPANY
Terminal Building
Norfolk 10, Va.
G . bI. Cornell May 15, 1956
Assistant tc President File:
67-"
.
Mr. E. L. Clark, General Chairman
Brotherhood of Railway Carmen
of America
310 Straley Avenue
Princeton, West Virginia
Dear Sir:
In our conference at Norfolk, Va., on May 15, 1956, we
again discussed the question of payment to employe forced on
anther shift to fill a permanent vacancy or new job during
bulletin period.
When it is necessary to fill a permanent vacancy or new
position during the bulletin period of the position it has been
our practice to fill it with the ,junior employe whose own job can
be blanked. We have not been paying such employe overtime on the
first and last shift on the theory that he was filling a permanent
vacancy or new job and hence came under Rule 12(b).
After our further discussion it appears to me there may be
a reasonable compromise of this matter. I suggest that we continue
our practice of using the junior employe whose job can be
blanked when it is necessary to fill a permanent vacancy or new
position during the bulletin period. If such employe is the one who
is assigned at the end of the bulletin period, either by bidding in
the job or by being forced on the job under applicable rules, he
will
not receive any overtime for changing shifts. If, however, another
employe is assigned at the end of the bulletin period the employe
filling the vacancy during the bulletin period will be paid overtime
the first day he fills the position, if it is a change in shifts, and
the day he returns to his own shift, if it is a change in shifts.
Inasmuch as we desire to make any ruling agreed upon
applicable to all crafts under the Shop Crafts' Schedule of January 1,
1943,
will you please handle this matter with representatives of the other
crafts, If the above disposition of this matter is agreeable let me know
and I will prepare a formal interpretation to cover it.
Yours very truly,
S/ G. M. Cornell
Assistant to President f
I
i
i
i
I
I
Form 1 Award No.
6515
Page
4
D2~N~_~_,
7370
The application of Rule 12(c) is controlling here. As we read that
Rule the Carrier is exempted from
paying
punitive rates where a change in
shifts is made to accomodate an employe who is holding a temporary position who
expresses a desire to do so. The record clearly reflects that the change in
shifts which is the subject of this claim was made at the request of the Claimant.
He clearly falls within the category of an Employe " . . . desiring to change
shifts . . .". It does not do violence to the agreement to include within the
definition of "other good causes" the satisfaction of the employes request when
the Carrier determines that it is consonant with the proper operation of the
railroad.
Let us emphasize that we are not dealing here with an Employe who is
the holder of a regular position but an employe just recalled from furlough who
at the time of the change was filling a position on a temporary basis pending
its proper assignment through the bulletin procedure. We will
deny the
claim.
AWARD
ClaLt denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST1,MU BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest;, ~,r
Executive Secretary
Dated. at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of June.,
1973.
t