(Advance copy. The usual printed copies will be sent later.)

Parties

Dispute: Claim of Employes:

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

SECOND DIVISION


The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Robert A. Franden when award was rendered.

( System Federation No. 21, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
( (Carmen)

(
( Southern Railway Company (Central of Georgia)

Award No. 6518

Docket No. 6374

2-soU-CM- ' 73






Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and 11 the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway ,Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.

Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.

Claimant was suspended from the service of the carrier for ten days for failure to comply with the instructions of his foreman.

In the course of repairing a car it became necessary to jack the car. The claimant was instructed by his foreman as to how to jack the car. A dispute arose between the claimant and the foreman as to how the jacking procedure was to be accomplished. The claimant insisted that the procedure he used was safer than that required by the foreman. At the time of the dispute the foreman and claimant consulted with the general foreman who after acquainting himself with the facts of the dispute, instructed the claimant to use the procedure as instructed by his foreman. Claimant again refused and he was at that time held out of service pending the investigation. The investigation was held after proper notice and the discipline assessed.


Form 1 Award No. 651$
Page 2 Docket No. 6374
2-SOU-CM-'73
Claimant alleges that the carrier violated Rules 35 and 36 of the
Agreement between the parties.


        DISCIPLINE No employe shall be disciplined without a fair hearing by the carrier. Suspension in proper cases (the proper case is one where leaving the man in service pending an investigation would endanger the employe or his fellow employes or company interest) pending a hearing, which shall. be prompt, shall not be deemed a violation of this rule. At a reasonable time prior to the hearing, such employe and the duly authorized representative will be apprised of the precise charge in writing and given reasonable opportunity to secure the presence of necessary witnesses. If it is found that an employe has been unjustly suspended or dismissed from the service,

        such employe shall be reinstated with his seniority rights unimpaired, j

        and compensated for the wage loss, if any, resulting from said suspension

        or dismissal.

        RULE 36

                                            ESTABLISHING COMPETENCY i An employe who has been in the service of the railroad thirty (30) days shall not be dismissed for incompetency,, neither shall an employe be discharged for any cause without first being given an investigation." i The transcript of the investigation which is part of the record substantiates the charge that the claimant failed to comply with instructions. The Claimant's contention that his method of jacking the car was "far Safer" is not supported by the record. It is generally held in this industry that absent a showing of just cause personnel must comply with supervisory directives. We find nothing improper in the Carrier suspending, pending the hearing under Rule 35, an employe who refuses to obey the instructions of his supervisors. We find no violation of Rule 35 by the Carrier's action.


Rule 36 is not applicable in that the competency of claimant was not in question nor was he discharged.
                            i

                            A W A R D


        Claim denied.

        NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

        By Order of Second Division


Attest:
            C. %C.-~c.'

            Executive Secretary


-Lted at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of June., 1973.