(Advance copy. The usual printed copies will be sent later.)
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No.
6529
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
6317
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Irving R. Shapiro when award was rendered. i
( System Federation No.
154,
Railway Employes'
( Department,A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)
( I
( Illinois Terminal Railroad Compariy
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
i
1. That under the current agreement, Carrier improperly assigned
other than Carmen to dismantle freight cars at its Decatur,
Illinois Repair Track.
2. That accordingly, Carrier be ordered to make the Carmen whole
by additionally compensating Carmen R. Chase, H. Tadlock, R. Terry,
B. Walker, J. Tadlock, R. Shoemaker and L. Carter in the amount of
twenty-four (24) hours each at the time and one-half rate of pay.
r
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act as approved June 21, 19340
i
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
On December 20, 1971, one of Carriers road freight trains suffered
a derailment and fifteen freight cars sustained extensive damage. Carrier determined
that four of the cars were repairable and appropriate measures were taken relative i
thereto. The remaining eleven cars, which at the time of derailment were owned by
another Company, were declared "totalled'?, and by agreement with the owning Company
acquired by the Carrier, party hereto, with the intention "to dispose of these cars
at the scene of the accident". (Carrier attachment
3.)
Carrier then "verbally i
agreed" with Isringhousen Wrecking Service as follows:
i
f
i
I
Form 1 Award No. 6529
Page 2 Docket No.
6317
2-IT-CM-'73
"December 22, 1971
Subject: Derailment, Monticello, ILL., 12/20/71
on Illinois Central R. R. (Extra GRAIN
UNIT TRAIN EAST)
(a) Seven (7) cars to be cut up and loaded into gondolas
at derailment, gondolas to be furnished by Illinois
Terminal.
(b) Four (4) cars to be trucked if possible (otherwise cut
up) and delivered on own wheels to Decatur yards.
(c) Above a and b at no cost to the Illinois Terminal,
also no transportation cost to Mr. Isringhousen .
(e) Illinois Terminal to receive the sum of $4,500.00
cash.
(f) Illinois Terminal to receive the following:
(1) Ten (10) pr. roller brg. wheels
G $300.00 $3,000.00
(2) Three (3) car sets roller@ 832.00 2,492.00
brg.
(3) Six side frames A-2 Q 202.00 1,213.00
(4)
Three (3) bolsters Q 269.00 807.00
s0
(Carrier memorandum of December 22, 1971, submitted as Carrier
attachment 2)
The four cars referred to in (b) were rerailed and moved to Carrier's.
Decatur, Illinois Yards. On January 31, February 1 and February 2, 1972, employes
of Isringhousen Wrecking Service appeared at Carrier's Decatur, Illinois Yards and.
dismantled the four cars which were on the Rip track therein. A substantial amount
of salvaged parts were immediately turned over to Carrier and placed in its stock
at the Decatur Yards and other of its installations.
Petitioner charges that Carrier, by not utilizing Claimants, who
were ready,
willing,
able, and available, to do the work
on
the four cars, violated I,
Rules 124
and
32 of the Controlling Agreement between the parties. Said Rules
read in part
"Classification of Work.
Carmen's work shall consist of building, maintaining, dismantling
(except all-wood freight-train cars), . . . all passenger and freiguc
cars, both wood and steel, . ."
i
I
^orm 1 Award No.
6529
Page
3
Docket No.
6317
2-IT-CM-'73
"tee
32
Assignment of Work.
i
. None but mechanics or apprentices regularly employed as '
such shall do mechanics' work as per special rules of each i
craft, except foremen at points where no mechanics are
employed . . . ."
I
Carrier rejected the claim on the following grounds. (1) It had
properly sold the "totalled" equipment in full "f.o.b." the wreck site. They
were therefore the property of Isringhousen Wrecking when worked on by its employes.
(2)
The salvaged parts were purchased from Isringhousen3, the then
owner of same.
(3)
The Controlling Agreement was not applicable because the
equipment was not Carrier's property and therefore none of its rules were violated.
Petitioner does not, in the
instant
matter, challenge the right of
Carrier to sell its equipment and have the purchaser remove same from Carrier's
property. If it did, it would have been faced with the holdings of this Board
rejecting claims based thereon. Awards
2377, 2922, 3158, 3228, 3585., 3586, 3635,
S36, 3739, 4476, 5957
and
5958.
i
The crux of this dispute rests on whether Carrier actually divested
itself of a proprietory interest in the four cars in question, before February 21,
1971. In Awards too numerous to cite, we have stated in effect that saying so
does not make it so. The December 21,,
1971
Intracarrier Memorandum by Carrier's
Chief Mechanical Officer quoted hereinablve does not substantiate a clear and
definitive transfer of ownership of the cars. It does establish that on the day
after the derailment, Carrier desired to retain for its own subsequent use a
substantial amount of salvageable materials to be realized from dismantling. In
effect, Isringhaused Wrecking was to pay
$4,5000.00
for the scrap of the eleven
cars which were "totalled". Carrier was to secure parts, presumably from the four
cars, valued at $7512.00. No evidence of actual sale and purchase to and from
Isringhausen is found in the record. The cars remained on Carrier's property at
all times involved. Although Carrier alleges that it "leased" space on its
Rip track to Isringhousen (Carrier's Exhibit E) for dismantling of the cars, it
offers no probative evidence or even a statement as to an amount charged therefor.
Based upon the record before us, it must be held that Carrier
had "de facto" ownership and possession of the four cars dismantled on January
31,
j
February 1 and February
2, 1971
in its Decatur, Illinois Yards, and is therefore
distinguishable from fact patterns in the cited Awards relied on by Carrier. There j
were mechanics of the Carmen craft employed at said installation available to perform
the dismantling and should have been assigned thereto by the Carrier.
i
I
I
r
Form 1 Award No.
652,
Page 4 Docket No.
6317
2-IT-CM-'73
r
Neither in its submission or its rebuttal did Carrier invoke,
in the alternative., the provisions of Article II of the National Mediation
Agreement of September 24,
1964
and therefore any limitations which might
stem therefrom are not applicable hereto.
A 4J A R D
Claim sustained, but at the pro rata rate.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest:
~~C'Sr,,~
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago,, Illinois, this 20th day of June.,
1973.