(Advance copy. The usual printed copies will be sent later.)
tm 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTIVIEZV''f BOARD Award No:
6596
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
6379
2-PT-CM-'73
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert A. Franden when award was rendered.
System Federation No. 18, Railway Employes'
Department, AFL - CIO
Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)
(
( Portland Terminal Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes: '
1. That the Portland Terminal Company violated the provisions of
the current agreement, namely, Rule
97,
on October
21, 22, 23,
2I+, 25,
26, 27,
28 and
29, 1971,
and on November 1, 2,
3
and I+,
1971,
while engaged in wrecking service at Clinton, Maine, on
the Portland to Bangor Main-Line.
2. That accordingly, the Portland Terminal Company be ordered to
additionally compensate the entire wreck crew, who were not
used on this assigrm.ent, namely, Carmen R. E. PaLmer, E. A. Dunham,,
H. L. Harriman,, G. H. Colton, F. G. H,~n; L. M. Dorr, G. W. Rounds, and
11. L. Campbell, for all time that the Rigby wreck outfit was engaged
in wrecking service at Clinton, Maine, on the foregoing dates, at
the carmen's applicable rates of pay under Rules
7
and
4
(f) of the
Agreement.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Subsequent to a derailment at Clinton, Maine the Waterville wrecking
crew was called to handle the emergency. In addition the Bangor wrecking crew was
called to assist. On October 21, the crane from the Bangor wrecking crew was damaged
to the extent that it was sent to the shop for repairs. At that time the Carrier
called the Rigby crane and the operator of the Rigby crane to the scene of the derailment. No other members of the Rigby wrecking crew were called for services.
orm 1 Award No
;..6596
Page 2 Docket No.
6379
2-PT-CM-'73
It is the position of the organization that the Carrier violated
the agreement in not calling the entire Rigby wrecking crew. The alleged violation
is based on Rule
97,
which reads as
follows:
"RULE
97
- MAKE UP OF WREC'~TG CREWS - When wrecking crews axe
called for wrecks or derailments outside of yard limits, the
regularly assigned crew will accompany the outfit. For wrecks
or derailments within yard limits, sufficient carmen will be
· called to perform the work."
As we apply Rule
97
to the instant matter, the key words are,
Nhen wrecking crews axe called . . . the regularly assigned crew will accompany
the outfit." The Carrier alleged that it is within its prerogative to assign the
pieces of equipment it wishes "in the
manner it
deems is
in
the best interest of
the company." They further allege that there is no rule
in
the agreement that;
assigns a particular crane to a particular crew: Nonetheless, the Carrier is
contractually bound by Rule
97
to utilize the regularly assigned crew members
on equipment it utilizes outside the yard limits.
In the instant matter there is no basis for the Carrier calling
.the entire Rigby ~rrecking crew to operate the era: e, It is the opinion of this
-,ar~ ~,, y~ .n .~ r _ .. ~-m .a.
.11frrcu~,
however,
uilciwu
a ou.ifl~iciiii iatuuirC:i ~l i:i.%i~j%ct.'u iic~c:~usiy
uv vp~iiltc^. ti~i~iiiiaC
should have been utilized from the Rigby wrecking crew.
The Carrier has argued to this Board that the utilization of the
Rigby crane at Clinton was utilizing of same on a property over which the claimant
organization has no contractual rights. The Carrier cited a substantial number of
awards to substantiate its position in this regard. A review of the record reveals
that this issue was presented for the first time at the hearing before this Board.
It is axiomatic that it is incumbent upon a party urging such a position that the
same must be presented at some time prior to the appellate level.
It is the opinion of this Board that the Carrier shall compensate
under Rules
7
and l+(f) the members of the Rigby wrecking crew which normally have
been called to operate the equipment utilized at the Clinton derailment.
AWARD
Claim sustained in accordance with the above findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board _
OBy~r
l.-~X..~t != / > t,.. · J :~.- r
;^~)_.-'~,----.v ~.`~_,· ..
.
, _
Rose rie· urasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of November,
1973.