Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 6677
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
6564
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Irwin M. Lieberman when award was rendered.
( System Federation No. 117, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)
( The Western Pacific Railroad Company .
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
That under the Current Controlling Agreement, Carmen A.
Phillips, M. Craven and G. Boles were used to perform duties
of Carmen on emergency road service at Chillcoot Tunnel appro
ximately 215 miles north and west of where they worked as
regularly assigned Repair Track Carmen at Stockt6n, Cali
fornia. This took place on January
9
and 10, 1972. They were
transported by Carrier's owned truck. The Carrier paid them
as wrecking service employees, and we contend that they were
w
paid improperly.
That accordingly, the Carrier be instructed to pay Carmen A.
Phillips, M. Craven and G. Boles double time for work performed beyond sixteen (16) hours which was four
(4)
hours
apiece from 11:30 P.M. on January 9, 1972 to
3:30
A.M. January 10, 1972. This amounts to two (2) hours at straight
time rate for each of the three Carmen for the difference of
what they were paid and what they should have been paid.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in
this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of
the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Claimants, all carmen, performed their regular assignments at
Carrier's Stockton Repair Track on January 9, 1972 completing their toui·
r
Form 1 Award No. 6677
Page 2 Docket No.
6564
2-WP-CM-'74
of duty at 3:30 P.M. At the end of the shift all were transported by
truck to the scene of a derailment, arriving at the site, some
230
miles distant, at 11:30 P.M. They then worked on the site of the
derailment until
3:30
A.M.., January 10,
1972.
For the service from
11:30 P.M. until 3:30 A.M. the men were compensated at the rate of
time and one half.
Petitioner claims that the carmen should have been compensated.
at the double time rate for the four hour period specified above. This
position is based on the contention that the work was covered under Rule
10 (a) Emergency 'Road Service and Rule 7 (e) which provides for a double
time rate of pay for work beyond sixteen continuous hours of service.
Rule 10 (a) states:
"Rule 10. Emergency Road Service: (As Revised September 1,
1949.)
(a) An employe regularly assigned at a shop, engine
house, repair track, or inspection point, when called for
emergency road service away from such shop, engine house,
repair track or inspection point, will be paid from the time
ordered to leave home station, until his return for all service rendered in accordance with the practice at home station,
and will be paid straight time rates for straight time hours
and overtime rates for overtime hours for all time worked.
All time waiting and traveling outside of assigned hours at
home station will be paid for at one and one-half times pro
rata rates."
The Carrier maintains that Claimants were selected to augment
the wrecking crew at the derailment in accordance with Rule 115 (d) and
were correctly compensated as provided in Rule 10 (d). Those rules provide:
"Rule 115. Wrecking Crews: (d) When needed, men of any
class may be taken as additional members of wrecking crews
to perform duties consistent with their classification." And
"Rule 10. 'Emergency Road Service: (As Revised September 1,
1949.)
(d) Wrecking service employes will be paid under
this rule, except that all time working, waiting or traveling on an employe's rest days and holidays and all time working,
waiting or traveling outside of assigned hours at home station
on other days will be paid for at the rate of time and one-
_ - half . "
The Organization argues that Claimants were sent on emergency
road work rather than to assist a wrecking crew. The rationale for this
Form 1
Page
3
Award No. 6677
Docket No.
6564
2-WP-CM-174
position is that Claimants did not accompany the wrecker to the site of
the derailment, that it was a very long distance from their regular
assignment, and that they had never bid on or held an assignment as
members of a wrecking crew.
The language of Rule 115 (d) seems. entirely clear and unambiguous. Carrier has the unqualified right to select employes of any
craft as additional member of wrecking crews, including carmen. Once
employes are assigned to augment wrecking crew activity they become for
purposes of compensation members of the wrecking crew; in this case
Rule 10 (d) would. be applicable.
We find no merit in Petitioner's contentions.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
emarie Brasch - dministrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of April, 1974.