Dilute


              The Carrier received the following grievance doted February 213, 1971:


                "Employees fra;,I Maintenance of Way pzrforming Elrctric.ians work and leaving this work in unsafe renditions.


                Maintenance of Way laborers at East P:~ttshuryu Off:I;-a ;xss-z^`)i4irg, disassembling, and washing fluorescent fixtures. They are assembling these fixtures improper and the Electricians have to follow behind to make up for their mistakes. This is ur,sare,

                  .. , c _..H... ~~r _._ r'. ..` n:,a.r~.-. n.~.F:

                and, if t::~'c-n i iT: t un E~.:.v~i .... .:,. , - i.:.w i~:=,~:;~a~ ... o .,.:,


' a:ii: or t:hf." I'1::t'c.'.rW: falls, ?:-,'F. ~~:^,Z.i._ `JctiT2.1rv, ."::;iiI34cn'aI3C:'.

 $.
                of Way will claim this is not their 'work.


                We request that Maintenance of Way employees cease doing

                Electricians work and outside Electricians he paid for past electrical work performed by ~iaintenance of flay.


                We request four hundred boars (400 hours) far work perforlred by Craig Galley, Bob Lone;, A1 Cherneg3, Dale Anderson, and Herbie Bough, far work that should be done by the electric.an.5.


                                      /s/ F. E. Trusky

                                      Electricians Committoe"


          Findings: -


          The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


          The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the 1taiR.zy Labor Act as approved June 21,_ 1934.


          This Division of the Aci;,iustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


          Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.

Form 1 Award r;o. 6712
 Page- 2 Docket No. 6591.
 ,
                                          2-LiRI2-U:'>t:'i1-' 74


This controversy was, bro:z~ht before this Board on motion of the
 Carrier to secure resolution of an "unadjusted dispute betuwen it and the
 Organization"
          .


`throughout its submission Carrier. repeats and reiterates that the work assigned to be done by employees other than electricians was the removal, cl-~ar,ioand reinstalling of= "crates or shields" of fluorscenW ligbtino fixtures at Carrier's General Office Building. It further State's repeatedly that the assignment was "based upon existing practice" and that this had been the procedure followed regularly for many years. Tile Organization dial not file a rebuttal and therefore these allegations of the Carrier must be assumed to be valid.

    (either in its submission nor in attachrients thereto reflecting

handling of its grievance on the property does t-`re Org:-t-ization cite a
 Rule of the Controlling Agreement between the Parties upon which it relies
 for the claim submitted. 7fie Job Evaluation program and job descriptions
 set forth thor--in r.. do not c.roata C f'xLl·l:o:l.vity for d71.iig 1-L:3E'_ .':!ark involved
 in the craft for which the claim was made.

                      A W A R b


    Carrierts position an this c~ ~^ ;, is su^t=;znod.

                          ui.~.


                            W3TIONAL RAILRCf%n ADJUSVENT BOARD

                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
 National Railroad Adjustment Board

            _ ~ -=_ ~. ~W .


.By __ :r_R ., ~ c~-i.,- - ._

    R semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Bated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of June, 1974.