Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST= BOARD Award No. 6788
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 6630-I
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Nicholas H. Zumas when award was rendered.
( Roy Keeling, Petitioner
(
Parties to Dispute:
( Detroit and Toledo Shoreline Railroad Company
Dispute: Claim of Petitioner:
Petitioner, Roy Keeling, claims that he should be requalified for light duty status pursuant to an agreement
between The Detroit and Toledo Shoreline Railroad Company and
System Federation Number 16 Railway Employees Department and
specifically Rule 13 of that agreement captioned "faithful
service" which reads as follows:
"Employees who have given long and faithful
service in the employ of the company and who
have become unable to handle heavy work to
' advantage, will be given preference of such
light work in their line as they are able to
handle."
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in
this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning
of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
There is a jurisdictional defect in this dispute that prohibits
the Board from considering the merits of the claim.
The claim was declined by Carrier's highest designated appeals
officer on July 26, 1972, and was not submitted to this Board until
October
29, 1973.
Thus, the time limit had expired April 26,
1973,
and we are compelled to dismiss the claim.
Form 1
Page 2
Award No.
6788
Docket No.
6630-I
2-D&TSL-I-'74
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
tos marie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of November, 197+.