Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 6829
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 6740-I
2-B&o-I-'75
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Nicholas H. Zumas when award was rendered.
Parties to Dispute:
Dispute: Claim of Petitioner:
David L. Satterfield (Carman)
The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Compares
Is D. L. Satterfield entitled to compensation and allowances
for being placed in a worst position with respect to his compensation due to the termination of the Locomotive Painters Craft at
Grafton, West Virginia, in September, 1971?
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in
this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning
of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Bcard has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
A review of the record in this dispute clearly shows that Petitioner
is attempting to assert a claim before this-Board that was not handled
on Carrier's property as required by Section
3,
First (i) of the Railway
Labor Act, Circular No. 1 of the National Railroad Adjustment Board, acrd
not in accordance with the provisions of the applicable collective
bargaining agreement. Therefore, the claim is barred from consideration.
by the Division and must be dismissed.
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois,, this 11th day of March. 1975.