Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 6851
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 6674
r
2-C&NW-CM-'75
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert M. O'Brien when award was rendered.
( System Federation No. 12, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)
(
( Chicago & North Western Transportation Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. Car Inspector Harold Carlton, was unjustly suspended 20 days,
beginning February 10, 1973 through March 1, 1973 inclusive, due
to return to work March 2, 1973.
2. Car Inspector Carlton was erroneously charged with leaving his
assignment without gaining permission from proper authority on
January 11, 1973, and using abusive language when conversing with
General Foreman Frank Marshall by company radio and refused to
comply with instructions issued January 11, 1973.
3.
That the Chicago & North Western Transportation Company be
ordered to compensate Car Inspector Carlton for the twenty days
he was improperly suspended.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in
this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning
of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
On January 11, 1973 claimant was held on duty in order to perform
overtime work. At approximately 12:30 A. M. on that date Mr. Marshall,
Carrier's General Car Foreman, called claimant on the radio to determine
if arrangements had been made to fill the oil cans on the remaining cars
of the train that was being serviced. According to Mr. Marshall, claimant
retorted "Listen here, don't you try to push me damn it, because you're not
going to do it, and I'm going to check out." Marshall further stated that
claimant did, in fact, check out without any permission to do so.
;-· ~`'
Form 1 Award No. 6851
Page 2 Docket No. 6674
2-C&NW-CM-' 75
As a result of that incident, claimant was charged with using abusive
language toward Mr. Marshall, and with leaving his assignment without
permission from proper authority. Following a hearing held relative to
these charges claimant was suspended for 20 days. Claimant denies using
abusive language toward Marshall. He also maintains that Marshall had
given him permission to check out on the date of claim.
Besides contending that the foregoing charges were not proven by
substantive evidence, the Organization also contends that claimant's
rights were violated when Carrier failed to call Mr. Don Gray to testify
at the hearing after Mr. Marshall had testified that Gray had witnessed
the conversation between him and the claimant. We do not feel that any
procedural rights inuring to claimant were violated as a result of
Carrier's failure to call Mr. Gray as a witness. At no time during the
hearing did claimant or his representative indicate to the hearing
officer that they wished Mr. Gray called as a witness. If they believed
his presence to be necessary then they should have exercised their right
to either call him as a witness themselves, or request that the hearing be
adjourned and that Carrier call Gray to testify. They availed themselves
of neither recourse and should not be heard to complain at this late date.
We further believe that the charges have been substantiated by the
testimony of Mr. Marshall. However, in light of claimant's unblemished
personal record for a period of 19 years service with the Carrier we are
compelled to conclude that even suspension for 20 days was excessive and
unreasonable discipline. In light of this, suspension for a period of
5
days wouldlave been commensurate with the offense arid we hereby order the:
discipline imposed reduced to 5 days suspension and further order claimant,
compensated for the 15 days in which he was unjustly held out of service.
A W A R D
Claim sustained to the extent indicated, supra, in the Opinion.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By t.'~ ..J
osemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Date at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of April, 1975.