Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No.
68
Ff
SECOND DIVISION Docket No.
6627
2-TP&W-CM-'75
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Dana E. Eischen when award was rendered.
( System Federation No.
6,
Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)
(
( Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
(1) That under the current Agreement the Carrier improperly used
other than Carmen to deliver and return piggyback trailers
from the TP&W Railroad Company to Caterpiller Tractor Company,
East Peoria, Illinois on January 4th and 5th,
1973.
(2)
That accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to compensate Carmen
D. F. Pearson, J. E. Whetstone, R. Dowler, C. E. Rutledge and
. R. E. Fredrick for two hours pay at the applicable Carmen's
rate for each trailer moved from the Carrier's piggyback ramp
to Caterpiller Tractor Company and two hours pay for each trailer
moved from Caterpiller Tractor Company to the Carrier's
piggyback ramp on January 4th and 5th,
1973
and all dates
subsequent.
Findings:
The Second Division of the
Adjustment Board,
upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in
this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning
of the Railway Labor Act as approved June
21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
The record shows that on January 4 and
5, 1972
employees of O'Neill
Brothers Transfer and Storage Company picked up some TOFC (piggyback)
trailers at Carrier's ramp and hauled them to Caterpiller Tractor Company.
The tractors apparently were loaded at the Caterpiller Tractor Company
and returned to Carrier's .ramp where they were loaded on flat cars and
subsequently carried by rail to York. Pennsylvania. Claimants are
employed at Carrier's piggyback ramp at East Peoria, Illinois as truck
drivers whose work is loading and unloading piggyback trailers from
railroad cars and pulling them to various locations in and around
Form 1 Award No.
6884
Page 2 Docket No.
6627
2-TP&W-CM-'75
Peoria, Illinois. The trailers in question were loaded and unloaded
from railroad cars by Claimants, but they were hauled to and from
Caterpiller Company by O'Neill employees. Petitioner, on behalf of
Claimants, contends that this violated the Agreement effective April 1,
1973, Rule 111, which incorporates the terms of a Memorandum Agreement
dated January 25,
1961,
and reads as follows:
"The loading and unloading of trailers.in TOFC service
at E. Peoria Yard is Carmen's work. The driving of
equipment necessary for the execution of Trailer on
Flat Car Plan II which is door to door pick up and
delivery of trailers that have been unloaded/or are
to be loaded at E. Peoria Yard, is Carmen's work. The
driving of equipment necessary to transport trailers
over the highway from Carrier's rails to another rail,
connection for further trailer rail movement is Carmen's
work.
The inspection of trailer securement for TOFC movement
is Carmen's work.
NOTE: When, under tariff provisions the Consignor
or Consignee is allowed to pick up and/or
deliver trailers the Carmen will have no:.
claim to this work."
Carrier resists the claim primarily upon the ground that once the
trailers are off-loaded by Claimants at Peoria they are no longer TPW
work but rather revert to the Penn Central Transportation Company for
further movement. The Penn Central has retained O'Neill Brothers to
handle the trailers over the highway in lieu of further rail service.
On the return trip the Carrier asserts that the trailers are not TPW
work until they are delivered to the TPW ramp by Penn Central's agent,
O'Neill Brothers. Thus, Carrier argues that it is an intermediate
Carrier only between Peoria and Effner, that the shipment is so routed that
under applicable tariffs it has no responsibility or authority over the
road delivery at either end of the movement, and that Claimants cannot
claim Penn Central work under the controlling Agreement between the
Carrier and the Organization.
The Organization insists that the clear language of Rule 111, supra,
makes the haulage to and from Caterpiller Company Carmen's work under
the Agreement. It is pointed out that Carrier herein serves as billing
or receiving agent for the Penn Central and, in fact, arranges with O'Neill
Brothers for the pick up and delivery to Caterpillar of the trailers.
Finally, the Organization notes that Carrier reimburses $11.00 to Penn
Central of the $22.00 charge per trailer that O'Neill Brothers receives
for each haul.
Form 1 Award No. 6884
Page 3 Docket No. 6627
2-TP4W-CM-'75
We have considered carefully the Agreement language cited and the
evidence offered by each of the parties in this case. Although any one
piece of evidence might support a different conclusion we are of the
considered opinion that the sum total of the evidence leads to a finding
that movement from Carrier's ramp to Caterpiller and return was Penn
Central and not TPW work. As such, it is not-controlled by the cited
rule of the Agreement herein. Numerous awards of this and other Divisions
have held that work belonging to a third party and thus outside the
control of Carrier cannot support a claimed violation of the Agreement
regarding assignment or performance of work by Carrier's employees.
See Awards 2213, 4570, 6533; also Third Division Awards 8076, 9762,
20250 and 20529. We have no alternative but to deny the claim.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
B r'
y
Ro emarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of July, 1975.