,f--, Forri 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSM'ENT BOARD Award No. 6898
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 6680
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Nicholas H. Zumas when award was rendered.
( System Federation No. 7, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)
( Burlington Northern Inc.
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
. 1. That in violation of Rule
83
and Rule 27(a) of the current
agreement, the Carrier improperly permitted or allowed other
than Carmen to make repairs to BN Caboose #10292, consisting
of inspecting, removing and applying air hose on January 17,
1973.
2. That, accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to additionally
compensate Carman M. L. Redman fogy (4) hours at the pro rata
rate for said violation.
Findings:
s
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in
this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning
of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
From the evidence of record it appears that a brakeman changed out
an airhose on his caboose while his train was in a yard where carmen are
employed. It further appears that the brakeman performed this work
voluntarily without the authority, direction or permission of Carrier.
While there are two or more awards to the contrary, the majority
and better reasoned awards of this Board hold that a voluntary act by
an'employe not entitled to the work without direction or knowledge by
Carrier does not constitute a basis for a claim. The most. recent pronouncement of this holding is Second Division Award No. 6858 where it
was stated:
' Form 1 Award No.
6898
Page
2 Docket No. 6680
' 2-BNI-CM-'75
"This Board, in numerous awards of several Divisions has
adopted the principle that work voluntarily performed by
an employee without direction or control of Carrier,
shall not support a claim by another for misassignment
of work. We find such reasoning pertinent and persuasive
herein and shall accordingly, deny the claim."
See also: Second Division Award No.
4803,
and Third Division Awards
No.
12951, 7793
and
4992.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST= BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
By
Rose m rie Brasch - Administrative Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of August,
1975.