Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 6907
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 6757
2-B&O-F&0-'75





Parties to Dispute:



Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.

Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.

The question at issue is whether Claimant was dismissed without the "fair and impartial hearing" prescribed by Rule 9 of the applicable Agreement.

Claimant was charged with attempted theft of company property and, after hearing had been held on the charges, was "found guilty" and dismissed from Carrier's service. There is substantial credible evidence in the record that Claimant had been observed by Foreman Palm carrying four pieces of brass from the storage bulk shed to the edge of the property and. setting it on the ground in the parking lot. It also is established that his assignment required him to work on the fuel track, a considerable distance from the bulk shed, and that no one had requested him to go to the shed area or carry brass that day. Although Claimant denied removing or carrying the brass, it is well settled in Railroad Adjustment Board practice that Carrier's findings will not be dist-arbed if supported by substantial, though controverted, evidence.









('' the claim.

~J
A W A R D






      Attest: Executive Secretary

      National Railroad Adjustment Board


                      ,


        Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


      Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of August, 1975.