f^i`'' Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 6997
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 6784
2-SCL-CM-' 76
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Harold M. Weston when award was rendered.
( System Federation No. 42, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.










Finding

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Ra ilway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant was furloughed on October 3, 1956, and recalled to Carrier's service on October 9, 1972. He was required to take a physical examination before assignment and was disqualified on the basis of Carrier's Medical Department's findings that he ?'should not do heavy labor" because of a back condition.

The first medical report contesting these findings was received by Carrier on December 6, 1972, from Dr. Bright MCCOnnell. Carrier submitted the back x-rays examined by fro McConnell to Dr. James Cranford fcr opinion and the latter reported favorably upon Claimant's physical condition in a letter of January 10, 1973. One week later on January 17, Claimant was permitted to begin work. ..f
. . t

Form 1 Award No. 6997
Page 2 Docket No. 67,84
2-SCL-CM-176
It is always a matter of concern when an employe is deprived of
earnings through no fault of his own. However, it was not unreasonable for
Carrier to have required a physical examination of an employe who had been fur
loughed for some 16 years. Nor is there any persuasive basis for Petitioner's
contention that Carrier unduly delayed the matter during October and November
1972. It was incumbent upon Claimant, if he disagreed with the findings of
Carrier's Medical Department, to present medical evidence in support of his
own position. He did not do so until December 6, 1972.

In our judgment, Carrier should have moved more swiftly once it was aware of Dr. McConnell's findings to make certain that Claimant was not being unreasonably deprived of employment. So far as the record shows, a ten day period should have been ample time to clarify the matter and protect its own interests.

We accordingly will sustain the claim for the period from December 16, 1972, to January 16, 1973, inclusive.



      Claim sustained to the extent indicated in the last sentence of the

Findings..

                            NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

    By ~' ~.~ T~,~ £~ CSC _ - ,i--,~ .7- Cl ~~ ~' ~, osemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


    Dated at Chicago,. Illinois, this 30th day of January, 1976.