2. That accordingly, the Carrier be ordered to reverse the sixty
' (60) days discipline assessed the Claimant, and that he be
. properly restored to his rightful position with all rights















Form 1 Pa ge 2

I[ r Nn

Docket No. 6762

2-SOU-F&0-'76


the scheduled hearing before apprising claimant that charges of insubordination and threatening an officer of the Company were to be added to the c1larges of conduct unbecoming an employe* If this Board were convinced that claimant was not given adequate opportunity to prepare his defense to the charges added on July 14, then the Organization's argument that clairant was thereby deprived of a fair and impartial hearing in violation of the governing Agreem..ent.might have validity. However, such is not the case here. The Organization, when apprised of the additional charges, was given the opportunity to postpone the Hearing. However, after consultation with the claimant, Mr. Benton, claimant's representative at the Hearing, agreed to proceed with the investi gation. If there was a valid due process argument, it was certainly waived when the claimant and his representative weed to proceed with the Hearing;.

At the foregoing Hearing, substantial evidence was adduced indicating that at the end of his tour of duty on July 10, 1973, claimant had cursed and threatened several other Carrier employees in the parking lot adjacent to the Diesel House at Ludlow Shop. Claimant offered no plausible explanation for his actions. Nor was there brought forth any extenuating or mitigating circumstances which would justify his tirade. When you couple the foregoing to claimant's obvious insubordination toward General Foreman Brown on July 12, 1973, the conclusion is readily apparent that the Carrier has sustained the burden of proving by substantive evidence the charges preferred against the claiment. And sixty days suspension was clearly not excessive in light of the gravity of claimant's actions `on July 10 and July 12, 1973.

Claimant was afforded a fair and impartial Hearing; the charges were proven; and the discipline meted out was not excessive. Therefore, the claim lacks merit and it will be denied.

A W A R D

Claim denied.

Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division

By / age
'" r o~emarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 24th day of February, 1976.