Form i NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7051
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 6789-T
2-BN-CM-'76
The Second Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee David P. Twomey when award was rendered.
( System Federation No. 7, Railway Employes'
( Department, A. F. of L. - C. I. 0.
Parties to Dispute : ( (Carmen)



Dispute: Claim of Employes:,

1. 1. That the Burlington Northern Inc. violated Rules 27(a), 83








Findings : . .

The Second Divisiin of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or empldyes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The Claimants Carman L. W. Winters is employed in the Diesel Shop in Vancouver, Washington, as a locomotive carpenter. His regular assigned hours are 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.., Monday through Friday, with rest days Saturday and Sunday. On Saturday, April 14 1973, Mr. R. Rogalski, a blacksmith, on his regular assignment at the Diesel Shop, removed and replaced a coupler on a diesel locomotive. On Saturday, May 5, 1973, Mr. Rogalski, on duty on his regular shift raised a coupler and inserted a shim and replaced a broken window. On Sunday, May 6, 1973, Mr. Rogalski., on duty on his regular shift in the Diesel Shop, raised a coupler and inserted a shim. Each claim date was on the Claimant's rest days.
Form 1 Award No. 7051
Page 2 Docket No. 6789-'f
2-BN-CM-176

The Organization contends that Rules 27(a), 83 and 98(c) were violated by the Carrier when the Carrier assigned the blacksmith to do the above described work on the dates above. The Carrier contends, among other things, that the use of a machinist, blacksmith or a sheet metal worker to perform the work in question is the product of a long standing practice on the former SP & S Railway. The purpose of Rule 98(c) is to preserve pre-existing rights accruing to the employees covered by the Current Agreement as they existed in effect on the SP&S prior to the date of the merger into the Burlington Northern. The Carrier submits evidence in the form of written statements from the supervisors as proof that a longstanding practice did exist a t the Diesel Shop whereby the locomotive carpenter was assigned from 7:00 A.M.,to 3:00 P.M., Monday through Friday; and during other hours and on weekends the type of-work at issue was performed by other mechanical forces (Carrier Exhibit 8; Employes' Exhibit 11 Attachments 1 through 7). The Organization disputes that such a practice existed (see, for example, Employes' Exhibit K, Attachments 1 through 5). It is settled beyond question that this Board does not resolve conflicts in evidence. On the record before us we are unable to resolve this conflict, and, since the burden of proof is on the petitioning Organization, we are required to deny this claim.






                            By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By ..~/

    Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of May, 1976.