Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7079
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 6818 'P
2-MP-SM-'76





Parties to Dispute:




Dispute: Claim of Employer:











Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record aid all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employer involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 193+.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



When the leak was found at the oxygen valve at the oxygen station located in the east end of the Annual House in North Little Rock, there was a need for a properly skilled employee to place a wrench on the packing nut for the shutoff valve and by pulling it approximately one-quarter turn, stop the leak. Thereafter a soapy solution was used to verify that the. leak had been stopped. The work was assigned to water service repairmen represented by the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employer and the work was accomplished in less than five minutes. The Sheet Metal Workers International Association claims this work and seeks compensation for two of its members for four (4) hours.
Form 1 Award No. 7079
Page 2 Docket No. 6818-T
2-MP-SM-'76

The applicable agreement, dat ed June 1, 1960,.provides~under Rule 97 that Sheet Metal Workers have rights to work that includes pipe fitting in shops and the connecting and disconnecting of air, water, gas, oil and steam pipes. This agreement was reached against a background of interpretations and understandings. The earliest in the record is Circular 76 dated June 1, 1935 and reissued January 2, 19+8. This circular purported to be an instruction for the information and guidance of all employer concerned. It provided "that at power plants, shops and.enginehouses where Mechanical Department employes are available, they shall do all ordinary maintenance work on these facilities above ground..." In an interpretation of the understanding dated May 17, 1950 executed by the two unions, the Sheet Metal Workers and the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employer, applicable to North Little Rock, it was agreed that Maintenance of Way Employer would have rights to new installations, relocations and dismantling of abandoned lines while Sheet Metal Workers would have rights to maintenance work including repairing, testing, inspecting all lines and equipment both inside and outside buildings, including changing and repairing all valves.

Thereafter on November 1, 1955 tripartite agreement executed by the above: two unions and the Carrier was reached and designated a memorandum of understanding. Its purpose was to eliminate disputes and allocate work between the employer of these unions. Under the first paragraph thereof, it provides:



Thereafter, its various provisions allocate the work between the unions and include the following relevant provisions:





It would appear, therefore, that the Sheet Metal Workers had a right to claim the work involved here unless the Water Service Employer could assert a better claim. Pursuant to provisions of the Railway Labor Act the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employer were invited to file a submission in this dispute, which they did. It consists primarily of signed communications from Water Service Employer located at the North Little Rock installation, indicating that they performed the work in dispute. That submission concludes:
Form 1 Award No. 7079
Page 3 Docket No. 6818-C
2-MP-SN-176
" the work performed at the Annual House on May 9,
1973 by Water Service forces is work of the character
traditionally and historically performed by such forces
and that any attempt by other crafts to appropriate such
work for themselves must be rejected and defeated."

Insofar as the third party submission does not cite an interpretation, understanding or award as persuasive authority for this conclusion, it is difficult to evaluate their claim. The third party rebuttal submission makes reference to agreement rules but none is cited. If they rely upon past practice, the record is far -from clear on this. There is even some indication that the Carrier and the third party are not in agreement on this subject. Nevertheless, we believe such claim to a past practice is called into question by the express terms of the tripartite agreement quoted above.

The Sheet Metal Workers rely upon Second Division Awards 6184 and 6517. We believe these awards afford authority for .the. conclusion we reach that the Sheet Metal Workers established their rights to this work.

The Carrier next contends the work involved an emergency. There may be some doubt that an emergency was proven. See Award 6837. It is clear, however, that under circumstances of an emergency the carrier has broader latitude in assigning employee. In support of this contention the Carrier cites a number of awards. They range from sudden unforeseen circumstances that require immediate action that cannot be delayed. See Awards 4490, 20527, 1374. There are also situations where there is a predictable happening that is likely to occur with a degree of regularity. See Awards 17487 and 4926. Danger may be involved in both types of emergency but the difference, for our purposes, lies in the special duty to plan and anticipate that is apparent in the second category.

We believe the circumstances here involved a predictable happening that one could anticipate would occur with some degree of regularity. This type of leak is not a first time occurrence in North Little Rock as the cited awards indicate and under these circumstances we cannot agree that the Carrier should have a free hand in suspension of the rules.

We conclude the Carrier violated the agreement in not assigning Sheet Metal Workers to the work in dispute and this should serve as a caution in such assignments for the future. However, the record indicates the amount of work is so minimal that it falls within the de minimus doctrine and no compensatory award is made. Further, on authority of the cited awards, a penalty is not authorized. See Awards 4926 and 3672.
Form 1 Award No. 7079
Page 4 Docket No. 6818-T
2-MP-SM-'76



Claire sustained in part and denied in part, in accordance with the findings.


                        By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By
Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 9th day of Julys 1976.