Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7228
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7047
2-L&N-CM-'77





Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)




Dispute: Claim of Employes:







Reimburse J. R. Dunavent for all losses sustained account of loss of coverage under health and welfare and life insurance agreements during the time held out of service.

Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The claimant was charged with excessive absenteeism from his regular assignment as a Carman at Decoursey and was dismissed from service, after formal investigation, on May 16, 1974. The record shows that he was originally employed on August 12, 1964, transferred to Decoursey on March 1, 1965, and established his seniority as a Carman on January 27, 1970.
Form 1 Award No. 7228
Page 2 Docket No. 7047
2-L&N-CM-'77

Petitioner seeks a sustaining award on the grounds of procedural defects in the conduct of the investigation in that the officer conducting the investigation, the Master Mechanic, made a prejudicial statement concerning the charge against claimant. Petitioner averred that this statement, together with other improprieties of the Master Mechanic during the investigation, show conclusively that the claimant had been adjudged guilty of the charge before the fact. With the exception of the following statementand other improprieties were challenged at the time of the investigation and removed from the record of the investigation.





There appears in the transcript of the investigation another statement, made by the claimant's supervisor, as follows:











It is to be noted that during a period spanning approximately twenty eight (28) months the claimant had been absent from duty a total of 272 days and had been cautioned in writing and verbally on more than one occasion concerning this matter. Appearing in the record before us is a statement from the claimant's doctor covering the period in question. This statement
Form 1 Award No. 7228
Page 3 Docket No. 7047
2-L&N-CM-`77

shows a total of twenty (20) visits by the claimant for treatment, one of which covered thirty (30) days off work due to a-fractured bone in the left hand, for a variety of ailments.

In view of the fact that the alleged improprieties of the official conducting the investigation were stricken from the record, with the exception of that official's statement quoted herein, and the fact that the discipline was assessed by the Division Superintendent who reviewed the record and not the officer conducting the investigation, it is our opinion that the challenged statement, in and of itself, was not sufficient to deprive the claimant of a fair and impartial investigation. While we do find that the investigation demonstrated that the Claimant was guilty of the charge it is the opinion of the Board that the penalty of dismissal was excessive in this case and that it has served its purpose. The Claimant is put on notice, by this Award, that it is necessary that he maintain a reasonable attendance record in the future and it is expected that he will live up to that obligation. In this regard, we direct that the Claimant and his representative meet with his immediate supervisor to reaffirm and remove any doubt in the mind of Claimant; what his obligations are regarding his attendance conduct. For the reasons stated we will order that the Claimant be returned to service without back pay but with all other rights unimpaired.






                          By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
        National Railroad Adjustment Board


By
      osemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 4th day of March, 1977.