Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7255
SECOi11D DIVISION Docket No. 7073-T
2-SCL-SM-177




Parties to Dispute:


Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



On August 31, 1973, Office Car 306 was in the Waycross Shop for maintenance and repair. On that date Carmen were assigned to perform certain work on the temperature control shutter mechanicsms located inside the car. There are eight such devices in this particular car, each consisting of a handle, a cable that connects the handle and the shutter door. The shutter door is located and concealed in the air duct that runs lengthwise in the car. Claim was filed by the organization on the ground that the assignment of Carmen to perform the disputed work was in violation of tile Sheet Metal Workers' Classification of Work Rule 85 of the Agreement, that such Rule clearly encompasses this type of work, and that such work has been historically performed by Sheet Metal Workers.

r;~ier. t:~e dis7ate was submitted to the Adjustment 3card therot'r~er~cod of Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada, System Federation No. 42, 5uuiili t tail a] CAL ~L;i'Wc Li" a~ ca 'Tlbd.liy- 1atc L'e6 tre_d 'l11,C d paL' Gy. "
Form 1 Award No. 7255
Page 2 Docket No. 7073-T
2-SCZ-SM-'77

The Carmen organization averred that the subject work is work historically
r~ri a that, ; t. _ " ' 'e ,,
y.. Cy:~:U~ by ~io.~ vw ~c~.i~-Z~z~.i.O~a, a ia,L, U 11c. C.icV~i,ii~d w~r~i i5 ex 1'52,1 JC~i
to Carmen by the Carmen's Classification of Work Rule 100, and that the
air, = c an a»-tern- .n fr^ nrr- _»rl ; --,,-c ,^ tr n-lr;; P..l ~.`.

The record shows that the Sheet Metal Workers' appeal letter to the Carrier, dated November 14, 1974, contained, in part, the following assertion:



Page 11, of the Carmen's ex parte submission contains the following statement:







craft. Page 2 of the letter of December 20, 1967, signed by the Carrier and representatives of each of the Shop Craft organizations, contains, in part, the following language:










Form 1 Award No. 7255
page 3 Docket No. 7073-T
2-SCL-SM-'77
"performing such work that were in effect prior to the
merger until such conflicts are settled.
The organizations will present to management their
proposals for settlement of such conflicts or disputes,
and the management w-Ill accept any reasonable proposal.
Rates of pay will not be a deciding factor in management's
acceptance or rejection of proposed settlements." (emphasis
added)

It is obvious, from the record before us, that a jurisdictional dispute exists regarding specific items of work covered by the respective classification of work rules of the two organizations, each averring that the work involved has been historically performed by employees in their respective craft.

Based upon a thorough review of the record in this case the Board finds that a jurisdictional dispute does exist, that an agreed upon procedure was established by all concerned parties for the settlement of such disputes, and that the Sheet Metal Workers have not availed themselves of such procedure. There are a host o_' recent Awards by this Division attesting to the fact that this Board, under the circumstances described above, does not assume jurisdiction over disputes between Organizations and we are therefore constrained to dismiss the claim. See Second Division Awards 7092, 7059, 7058, 6872, 6848, 6825 and many others.






                          By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

00-

,B V rA~
'-°' tcsemarie -rasc:i - :~:inistrative Assistant

Latted 8.i. Caicago, lii.Yl013, LUs c23tlml day u&.Oi i-.8.i ~:m iy I f