Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7255
SECOi11D DIVISION Docket No.
7073-T
2-SCL-SM-177
The Second Division consisted of the regular members arid in
addition Referee C. Robert Roadley when award was rendered.
( Sheet Metal Workers' International Association
Parties to Dispute:
( Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
Dispute: Claim of Employes:
1. The Seaboard Coast Line foreman at Waycross, Georgia Shop, assigned
a carman August
31, 1973,
to repair roam temperature control
shutter on office car
306.
2. That the Carrier 'be ,Drdered to compensate Sheet i4etai Worker
W. A. Ganas eight
(8)
hours pay at pro rata rate.
Findings:
The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
On August
31, 1973,
Office Car
306
was in the Waycross Shop for maintenance and repair. On that date Carmen were assigned to perform certain
work on the temperature control shutter mechanicsms located inside the car.
There are eight such devices in this particular car, each consisting of
a handle, a cable that connects the handle and the shutter door. The shutter
door is located and concealed in the air duct that runs lengthwise in the
car. Claim was filed by the organization on the ground that the assignment
of Carmen to perform the disputed work was in violation of tile Sheet Metal
Workers' Classification of Work Rule
85
of the Agreement, that such Rule
clearly encompasses this type of work, and that such work has been
historically performed by Sheet Metal Workers.
r;~ier. t:~e dis7ate was submitted to the Adjustment 3card therot'r~er~cod
of Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada, System Federation No. 42,
5uuiili
t tail a]
CAL ~L;i'Wc
Li"
a~ ca 'Tlbd.liy-
1atc L'e6
tre_d 'l11,C d paL' Gy. "
Form 1 Award No. 7255
Page 2 Docket No. 7073-T
2-SCZ-SM-'77
The Carmen organization averred that the subject work is work historically
r~ri a
that, ; t. _ " ' 'e ,,
y..
Cy:~:U~
by
~io.~
vw
~c~.i~-Z~z~.i.O~a,
a ia,L,
U
11c. C.icV~i,ii~d
w~r~i
i5 ex 1'52,1 JC~i
to Carmen by the Carmen's Classification of Work Rule 100, and that the
air, = c
an
a»-tern-
.n
fr^
nrr- _»rl ; --,,-c
,^ tr
n-lr;; P..l
~.`.
The record shows that the Sheet Metal Workers' appeal letter to the
Carrier, dated November 14,
1974,
contained, in part, the following assertion:
"Rules 26 (a) and
85
of the current working agreement has
been violated. Also on this one occasion carmen were
assigned to perform work involved in instant dispute, the
letter of Understanding dated December 20, 1967, was
violated."
Page 11, of the Carmen's ex parte submission contains the following
statement:
"If there is any jurisdictional dispute over this work, and
the Carmen feel there is not, but if there is, then the
Sheet Metal Workers are obligated by the very terms of
this letter of understanding (the December 20, 1967 letter)
to attempt to settle it with the Carmen, including if
necessary asking for a conference of all interested parties,
they have done none of this and are accordingly, in violation
of this letter of understanding,
..."
Carrier's rebuttal submission, pate 4, contains the following assertion:
"(4) The Union has failed to comply with letter dated
December 20, 1967 (Carrier's Exhibit C) which clearly
provides for settlement of disputes such as involved in
this case, if they consider such work belongs to their
craft. Page 2 of the letter of December 20, 1967, signed by the Carrier and
representatives of each of the Shop Craft organizations, contains, in part,
the following language:
"When the consolidated agreene nt becomes effective, it is
therefore agreed that; where conflicts exist regarding
specific items of work in the classification of work ruses
of the new agreement, no changes in the practices of
performing such work that were in effect prior to the
merger will be made by the Company until such conflicts or
jurisdictional disputes are settled.
Where there is a conflict in specific items of work between
the shop crafts and other organizations, it is agreed that
no chap-aes will be made by the Convany -in the practices of
Form 1 Award No.
7255
page
3
Docket No.
7073-T
2-SCL-SM-'77
"performing such work that were in effect prior to the
merger until such conflicts are settled.
The organizations will present to management their
proposals for settlement of such conflicts or disputes,
and the management w-Ill accept any reasonable proposal.
Rates of pay will not be a deciding factor in management's
acceptance or rejection of proposed settlements." (emphasis
added)
It is obvious, from the record before us, that a jurisdictional dispute
exists regarding specific items of work covered by the respective classification of work rules of the two organizations, each averring that the work
involved has been historically performed by employees in their respective
craft.
Based upon a thorough review of the record in this case the Board finds
that a jurisdictional dispute does exist, that an agreed upon procedure was
established by all concerned parties for the settlement of such disputes,
and that the Sheet Metal Workers have not availed themselves of such
procedure. There are a host o_' recent Awards by this Division attesting
to the fact that this Board, under the circumstances described above, does
not assume jurisdiction over disputes between Organizations and we are
therefore constrained to dismiss the claim. See Second Division Awards
7092, 7059, 7058, 6872, 6848, 6825
and many others.
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Second Division
Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board
00-
,B
V
rA~
'-°' tcsemarie -rasc:i - :~:inistrative Assistant
Latted
8.i.
Caicago,
lii.Yl013,
LUs
c23tlml
day
u&.Oi i-.8.i ~:m iy I f