~~_rm 1 YATTOYAr. RATT.ROAD An,rrTSrr BOATM Award 76. 7260
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7102-T
2-SCL-Si·'I-' 77





Parties to Dispute:



Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carr=_er and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The issue in this clan :is a narrow one. The Organization, Sheet Metal Workers'' International Association, dispute the assignment of an employee represented by the International Association of Machinists to the work of changing a rubber diaphragm in a sander relay of a diesel locomotive in the Carrier's Engine House in West Jacksonville. No claim is mane for performance of this work in the nearby air room maintained by the Carrier nor at other points in the Carrier's system.




~_i~t.t, _it~u.1 uJOi_~'L'1;~ .~<i.v2 ~~"!.'1,)1::i.~C~. '~Liia' ~r1Gi_: _P 'GI1C ~.:~1::C i1GlaSC. _::~' ~:1=t'Q party respondent, the Machinists claim that employees represented by them nave also done sucn worK iti -Gae tnglne nouse. Tne ooara nas no clear and rontr-i nci ncr pvi rlerca 'before ;,+;. +hat either rraf'f-, wa.e NPT,l,?r~.r a7e;_R-cA. a,1l the sander relay repair work in the Engine House. Such evidence would be required to sustain the organization's charge that the Carrier had "changed" the work assignment in the Engine House.
Form 1 Award No. 7250
Page 2 Docket No. 7102-T
2-SCZ-SM-'77

In determining the Organ! zati.on's exc1-Lisive ri urtc ±n the 7,7n"1_ ; n the Engine House, reference to the classification rules applicable to the two v:L'ca,i ub iS a.~J~j'Ci~JI'ia.l;C.












Form 1 Page 3

Award No. 7260
Docket No. '(102-r
2-SCL-SM-'77

"acetylene, thermit and electric welding on work generally recognized as sheet metal workers' work as provided in Pule ?_7, a,n~_ all other T.Tork c~ener~,IIy recocrn»ed ?,s sheet metal workers' work."

The Sheet Metal Workers rely only on the catch-all phrase, "and all other work generally recognized as sheet metal workers' work" as a basis for their claim. The Machinists' classification rule, however, includes the phrases: "maintaining, dismantling, and installing locomotives and engines ... engine inspection, air equipment". The sander relay being a part of air equipment, the Machinists' classification has specific reference to the work in question.

Ir, v'_e?~r of the mi::ed evidence ccrcer:anb Enginecuce pr a,c tice wand the language of the Machinists' classification rule, it is unnecessary for the Board to consider the Machinists' widespread performance of the work in other locations or the availability of alternate means of resolving jurisdictional disputes. Solid claim to the! work by the Sheet Metal Workers is simply not proven to the satisfaction of the Board.

A W A R D

Claim denied.

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretan
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By ~~?AAW -.d
semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, iris 20th day of March, 177.