Foam 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7328
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7197
2-L&N-FO-'77





Parties to Dispute: ( (Firemen & Oilers)



Dispute: Claim of Employer:












Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employer involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 193+.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



In the instant case, Carrier found that Claimant failed to protect his work assignment at Carrier's car department facilities in Bloomington, Indiana, from Monday, December 9, 197+, through the date of hearing on Thursday, December 19, 197+.

The record before us reveals that after Cla imam left home on December 10, 197+, he went into the State of Illinois, and was unable to return to Bloomington, Indiana, for reasons beyond his control, until December 26,
197+. On December 26, 197+, Claimant went directly to Carrier's facilities
Form 1 Award No. 7328
Page 2 Docket No. 7197
2-L&N-FO-'77

in Bloomington, and reported to his General Foreman, but was refused permission to perform his duties by the Master Mechanic.

The record also shows that Claimant was a victim of very unusual and unfortunate circumstances, that he was a good and very reliable worker over the previous seven (7) years, without any discipline charges placed against his record prior to this instance.

Now, this Board has regularly refused to interfere with the detexmira tion of Carriers as to disciplinary action taken fox proven infractions. However, we reserve the right to correct a penalty which is excessive or unreasonable. (See Second Division Awards 6.85, 6236, 5703, and 389+). In Award 389+ the Board stated:




In applying these principles, we find that Claimant's dismissal from service of Carrier was excessive and unreasonable. It was his first offense of any kind recorded. Claimant was detained in the State of Illinois due
to circumstances beyond his control. However, we are also mindful that a~,
stable work force is a critical ingredient to the proper functioning of an
industrial community. Therefore, we believe that a prolonged lay-off from
work, with Claimant's seniority and other rights unimpaired, but without back
pay or insurance benefits fox time lost, will sexvie to impress upon
Claimant that compliance with reasonable and necessary rules is essential
if he is to maintain continuous employment and earnings.






                          By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

;By
          ; %''~L_ C/L

: Rosemarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 12th day of July, 1977.

                                                        Iwo