Form 1 '11HATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTA!ENT BOARD Award No. 731
SECOND D17TISION Docket No. 7058
2-S00-CM-'77





Parties to Dispute: ( (C armen)
(
( Soo Line Railroad Company

Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 193+·

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


r O rm 1

Page 2


A,,,-ard -So. 7391
Docket No. 7058
?-SOO-cry-77

The question to be resolved in this dispute is whether Claimant invoked the provisions of Article 4 of the agreement within the required ten days after being notified by Carrier that he was disqualified for work.

On the basis of the evidence of record, the Board finds that Claimant timely invoked the provisions of Article 4 and should be paid, as provided by Article 4, "for any time lost between the date he was held out of service account of alleged disqualification and date of final report by the medical examiners ..."

Other than the compensation "for time lost," Claimant is not entitled to any of the other "benefits" or "expenses" claimed. There is no provision for such and none will be allowed.

A W A R D

Claim disposed of per findings herein.

Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST14MTT BOARD

By Order of Second Division


Ro emarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of November, 1977
Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 7391
SECOND DIVISION Docket No. 7058
2-S00-CM-'77





Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)




Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction. over the dispute involved herein.


Form 1 Award No. 7391
Page % Docket i~To. 7058
2-soo-CM-77

The question to b e resolved in this dispute is whether Claimant invoked the provisions of Article 4 of the agreement within the required ten days after being notified by Carrier that he was disqualified for work.

On the basis of the evidence of record, the Board finds that Claimant timely invoked the provisions of Article !+ and should be paid, as provided by Article 4, "for arms time lost bet weep the date he was held out of service account of alleged disqualification and date of final report by the medical examiners ..."

Other than the compensation "for time lost," Claimant is not entitled to any of the other "benefits" or "expenses" claimed. There is no provision for such and none will be allowed.






                          By Order of Second Division


Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

By
Ro(emarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of November, 1977.