Form 1 itATIOPIriL PAILROAD ADJ7JS'"~%IE= BOARD Award No. 739
SECOND DhTISICT Docket .io. 7060
2-AC&Y-CM-' 7





Parties to Dispute: ( (Carmen)



Dispute: Claim of Employes:





Findings:

The Second Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 193+.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This is a claim for overtime pay by a Claimant who eras not used to perform wrecking service while another employe (who had some 70 hours more overtime than Claimant) was used.

Basic to a claim for overtime pay on a particular date under the overtime equalization rule is evidence in the record that the employe who worked in lieu of the Claimant did in fact receive overtime pay. There is nothing substantive in this record to indicate whether Heffner (the carman used) was paid overtime. This deficiency precludes the Board from fui°ther inquiry.
Form 1
Rage 2

Claim denied.

Attest: Executive Secretary
National Railroad Adjustment Board

A W A R D

By
R~semarie Brasch - Administrative Assistant

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of nTovenioer, 1977.

Award IvTo . 7392
Docket .To. 7060
2-AC&Y-CM-'77

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD'
By Order of Second Division